From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:07:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5697AB9C.2080803@cardoe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452779824.2185.37.camel@citrix.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1414 bytes --]
On 1/14/16 7:57 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 05:50 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 14.01.16 at 12:42, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> The bisector is working:
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable
>>> /test
>>> -amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.xen-install.html
>>>
>>> and has gotten to this range:
>>>
>>> $ git log --oneline 5513bd0b4675..20c8f1a8a5fd
>>> 20c8f1a convert XSM_ENABLE to Kconfig
>>> 529298f convert FLASK_ENABLE to Kconfig
>>> 361b4f9 build: save generated xen .config
>>> e3cce17 x86/VPMU: implement ipc and arch filter flags
>>>
>>> I suspect the issue is that 529298f removes FLASK_ENABLE from the top-
>>> level, but that is used in tools/Makefile. i.e. there is that other
>>> patch
>>> which needed to go before the two included above.
>>
>> And is that other patch ready to go in? If not, do we need to
>> revert another time?
>
> I think that is likely to be the case, yes.
>
>> In any event - Doug, you should point out such dependencies in
>> the submission, e.g. after the first --- marker.
>
> Really they should have been in the same series in this case.
>
> Ian.
>
They were all in the same thread. And were all acked. But the first one
against the tools shouldn't have been necessary, it should have still built.
--
Doug Goldstein
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-14 14:58 [OSSTEST PATCH] enable FLASK_ENABLE when using it for testing Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 14:28 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] pass --{enable, disable}-xsmpolicy based on XSM state Doug Goldstein
2016-01-13 19:30 ` [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-01-14 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 11:42 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 12:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 13:57 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 14:07 ` Doug Goldstein [this message]
2016-01-14 14:44 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 14:54 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 14:48 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 15:04 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 16:27 ` [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL [and 2 more messages] Ian Jackson
2016-01-14 17:07 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 17:18 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-14 17:25 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 19:10 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-15 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-15 17:06 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-15 17:10 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-15 17:15 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-15 17:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-15 17:42 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 7:49 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 8:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-18 9:41 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 9:47 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 11:22 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 11:28 ` Ian Jackson
2016-01-18 11:36 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18 12:09 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-15 17:21 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 21:40 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] pass --{enable, disable}-xsmpolicy based on XSM state Doug Goldstein
2016-01-16 20:50 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-14 16:22 ` [OSSTEST PATCH] enable FLASK_ENABLE when using it for testing Ian Campbell
2016-01-14 16:34 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-01-16 20:54 ` Doug Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5697AB9C.2080803@cardoe.com \
--to=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).