xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] x86/PV: enable the emulated PIT
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:50:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569CB579.5030200@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569CA5CB02000078000C7C43@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

El 18/01/16 a les 8.43, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
>>>> On 15.01.16 at 18:45, <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Changes since v2:
>>  - Change 'if ( (a && b) || (!a && c) )' into 'if ( a ? b : c )'.
> 
> Thanks, but after some more thinking about it I'm afraid there are
> a few more aspects to consider here:
> 
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -542,8 +542,9 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, unsigned int domcr_flags,
>>                     d->domain_id, config->emulation_flags);
>>              return -EINVAL;
>>          }
>> -        if ( config->emulation_flags != 0 &&
>> -             (!is_hvm_domain(d) || config->emulation_flags != XEN_X86_EMU_ALL) )
>> +        if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ? (config->emulation_flags != XEN_X86_EMU_ALL &&
>> +             config->emulation_flags != 0) :
>> +             (config->emulation_flags != XEN_X86_EMU_PIT) )
>>          {
> 
> For one I think it would be a good idea to allow zero for PV domains,
> and perhaps even default new DomU-s to have the PIT flag clear.
> (Also - indentation.)

This sounds fine to me, but IMHO, it should be done in a separate patch.
This patch just restores previous behaviour for PV guests, then we can
move on from there.

> And then - is all this working as intended for the hwdom != Dom0
> case?

I have to admit I have not tried it, but AFAICT in the hwdom != Dom0
case the set of enabled emulated devices should be the same as a normal
guest, the hardware domain doesn't get any more or less emulated devices
than any other guest ATM.

Roger.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-18  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-15 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/4] HVMlite: minor fixes and Dom0 preparatory patches Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] xen/elfnotes: check phys_entry against UNSET_ADDR32 Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-19  9:21   ` Wei Liu
2016-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] libelf: rewrite symtab/strtab loading for Dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/hvm: don't set the BSP as initialised in hvm_vcpu_initialise Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/PV: enable the emulated PIT Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-15 17:08   ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-15 17:45     ` [PATCH v3 " Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-18  7:43       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18  9:29         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-18  9:44           ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 10:41             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-18 11:06               ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 16:10                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-18 16:27                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 16:33                     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-18 16:44                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-18 17:58               ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-18 18:03                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-19  9:24                   ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-19 10:09                     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-19 10:28                       ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-19 10:56                         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-20 11:57                 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-18  9:50         ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2016-01-18 10:06           ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569CB579.5030200@citrix.com \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).