From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: netfront/netback multiqueue exhausting grants
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:40:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569F9C6A.9070008@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1453292623.26343.95.camel@citrix.com>
On 01/20/2016 07:23 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> There have been a few reports recently[0] which relate to a failure of
> netfront to allocate sufficient grant refs for all the queues:
>
> [ 0.533589] xen_netfront: can't alloc rx grant refs
> [ 0.533612] net eth0: only created 31 queues
>
> Which can be worked around by increasing the number of grants on the
> hypervisor command line or by limiting the number of queues permitted by
> either back or front using a module param (which was broken but is now
> fixed on both sides, but I'm not sure it has been backported everywhere
> such that it is a reliable thing to always tell users as a workaround).
>
> Is there any plan to do anything about the default/out of the box
> experience? Either limiting the number of queues or making both ends cope
> more gracefully with failure to create some queues (or both) might be
> sufficient?
>
> I think the crash after the above in the first link at [0] is fixed? I
> think that was the purpose of ca88ea1247df "xen-netfront: update num_queues
> to real created" which was in 4.3.
I think ca88ea1247df is the solution --- it will limit the number of
queues.
And apparently it's not in stable trees. At least not in 4.1.15, which
is what the first reported is running:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/log/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c?id=refs/tags/v4.1.15
-boris
>
> Ian.
>
> [0] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2016-01/msg00100.html
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2016-01/msg00072.html
> some before hte xmas break too IIRC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-20 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-20 12:23 netfront/netback multiqueue exhausting grants Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 14:40 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-01-20 14:52 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 15:02 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-20 15:10 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-20 15:16 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:12 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:25 ` Wei Liu
2016-01-21 10:37 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 10:52 ` Wei Liu
2016-01-20 16:18 ` annie li
2016-01-21 10:56 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-21 12:19 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-21 14:17 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-21 15:11 ` annie li
2016-01-22 3:36 ` Bob Liu
2016-01-22 7:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-22 10:40 ` Bob Liu
2016-01-22 11:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-23 0:29 ` Bob Liu
2016-01-25 9:53 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569F9C6A.9070008@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).