From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joao Martins Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] x86/time: streamline platform time init on plt_init() Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 10:31:39 +0000 Message-ID: <56A74B0B.7030101@oracle.com> References: <1451321985-13728-1-git-send-email-joao.m.martins@oracle.com> <1451321985-13728-4-git-send-email-joao.m.martins@oracle.com> <20160125202641.GZ14977@char.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160125202641.GZ14977@char.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Andrew Cooper , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/25/2016 08:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> + if ( clocksource_is_tsc ) >> + { >> + plt_init(); >> + } >> + else >> + { >> + plt_overflow_period = scale_delta( >> + 1ull << (pts->counter_bits-1), &plt_scale); >> + init_timer(&plt_overflow_timer, plt_overflow, NULL, 0); >> + plt_overflow(NULL); >> + >> + printk("Platform timer overflow period is %lu secs\n", >> + plt_overflow_period/1000000000); > > s/1000000000/SECONDS(1) ? > Yeah, looks much better that way. >> + } >> >> platform_timer_stamp = plt_stamp64; >> stime_platform_stamp = NOW(); >> -- >> 2.1.4 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org >> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel