From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clarifying PVH mode requirements
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:27:52 -0800
Message-ID: <56AFB1B8.5050202@gmail.com>
References: <56AE7C3B.7010100@gmail.com> <56AF3336.7040906@citrix.com>
	<56AF679E.4040104@oracle.com> <56AF7E7A.1040305@gmail.com>
	<56AFAEA7.9060003@oracle.com>
Reply-To: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <56AFAEA7.9060003@oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 02/01/2016 11:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes?
>
> Yes, HVMlite is replacing PVH. Probably once we get dom0 support.

If that's a 'done deal', and it sounds like it is, it'd be useful to 
have it integrated into:

   http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Understanding_the_Virtualization_Spectrum

particularly as there's no mention of HVMlite on the wiki, at all.

It's unclear whether PVH, in its current dev state (at least here), is 
worth-the-visit -- especially if HVMlite is "ComingSoon(tm)".

I suppose I'm looking for some guidance as to which to invest time in 
while on Xen 4.6.0, ack'ing that neither PVH nor HVMlite are 
production-ready.