From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xen/init: Annotate all command line parameter infrastructure as const
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:52:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B9EF1D.9010604@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B9ECE502000078000D00CC@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 09/02/16 12:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.02.16 at 18:07, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>> @@ -120,6 +120,12 @@ SECTIONS
>> .init.data : {
>> *(.init.rodata)
>> *(.init.rodata.str*)
>> +
>> + . = ALIGN(32);
> Why 32?
>
>> + __setup_start = .;
>> + *(.init.setup)
>> + __setup_end = .;
>> +
>> *(.init.data)
>> *(.init.data.rel)
>> *(.init.data.rel.*)
>> @@ -146,11 +152,6 @@ SECTIONS
>> __ctors_end = .;
>> } :text
>> . = ALIGN(32);
>> - .init.setup : {
>> - __setup_start = .;
>> - *(.init.setup)
>> - __setup_end = .;
>> - } :text
> If just because it was 32 here, I don't think that's a compelling
> reason. With it (above, not necessarily here) reduced to 8 (which
> of course could also be done while committing, if you agree and
> there are no deeper reasons),
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
It was just because of the code here. I still can't think of any
specific reason why 32 is needed, so the ALIGN() can just be dropped.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-09 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 17:07 [PATCH 1/3] xen/x86: Drop the uses of invbool_param() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen/init: Drop invbool_param() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-09 12:47 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-08 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/init: Annotate all command line parameter infrastructure as const Andrew Cooper
2016-02-09 12:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-09 13:52 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-02-09 14:32 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-09 14:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-09 14:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-22 16:36 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-22 16:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-22 18:43 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-02-23 8:07 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-09 12:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/x86: Drop the uses of invbool_param() Jan Beulich
2016-02-11 9:58 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B9EF1D.9010604@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).