From: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@bitdefender.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/vm-events: Move parts of monitor_domctl code to common-side.
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:42:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1C7CE.6000000@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1602151224140.27008@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On 2/15/2016 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 15.02.16 at 07:37, <czuzu@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>>> default:
>>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> + /*
>>> + * Should not be reached unless arch_monitor_get_capabilities() is not
>>> + * properly implemented. In that case, since reaching this point does
>>> + * not really break anything, don't crash the hypervisor, issue a
>>> + * warning instead of BUG().
>>> + */
>>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING
>>> + "WARNING, BUG: arch_monitor_get_capabilities() not implemented"
>>> + "properly.\n");
>>>
>>> - };
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> + }
>> I disagree with the issuing of a message here. At the very least this
>> should be a dprintk(). Perhaps an ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() would be
>> the way to go? What's worse though is that I can't see the checking
>> which would make true the "should not be reached" statement above
>> (not that you must not rely on the caller of the hypercall to be well
>> behaved).
> ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() is appropriate here
>
Noted.
Corneliu.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 6:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] Vm-events: move monitor vm-events code to common-side Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] xen/x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1 Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 8:30 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-02-15 17:40 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 17:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-02-15 17:54 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 18:10 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-02-15 6:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] xen/vm-events: Move parts of monitor_domctl code to common-side Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 8:46 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 12:14 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 12:44 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 13:29 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 14:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 16:15 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-02-15 16:28 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 16:44 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 16:51 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-02-15 16:59 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 12:21 ` Corneliu ZUZU
2016-02-15 12:25 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-02-15 12:42 ` Corneliu ZUZU [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C1C7CE.6000000@bitdefender.com \
--to=czuzu@bitdefender.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).