xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86emul: limit-check branch targets
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:59:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C4B508.7090409@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C4AF7D02000078000D3490@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 17/02/16 16:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All branches need to #GP when their target violates the segment limit
> (in 16- and 32-bit modes) or is non-canonical (in 64-bit mode). For
> near branches facilitate this via a zero-byte instruction fetch from
> the target address (resulting in address translation and validation
> without an actual read from memory), while far branches get dealt with
> by breaking up the segment register loading into a read-and-validate
> part and a write one. The latter at once allows correcting some
> ordering issues in how the individual emulation steps get carried out:
> Before updating machine state, all exceptions unrelated to that state
> updating should have got raised (i.e. the only ones possibly resulting
> in partly updated state are faulting memory writes [pushes]).
>
> Note that while not immediately needed here, write and distinct read
> emulation routines get updated to deal with zero byte accesses too, for
> overall consistency.
>
> Reported-by: 刘令 <liuling-it@360.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-17 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17 16:21 [PATCH 0/5] x86: XSA-170 follow-up Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86emul: fix rIP handling Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 17:51   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86emul: limit-check branch targets Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 17:59   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-02-25 14:52   ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2016-02-26  9:44     ` Tim Deegan
2016-02-17 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86emul: simplify IRET logic Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 18:03   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 16:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] VMX: fold redundant code Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 18:05   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18  5:26   ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-17 16:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: drop failsafe callback invocation from assembly Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 19:01   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C4B508.7090409@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).