xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Is: PVH dom0 - MWAIT detection logic to get deeper C-states exposed in ACPI AML code. Was:Re: [PATCH v2 10/30] xen/x86: Annotate VM applicability in featureset
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:24:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C5F04A.2020809@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56C5DF5F.10200@citrix.com>



On 02/18/2016 10:12 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/02/16 15:02, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 17/2/16 a les 20:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ha escrit:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:41:41PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> On 15/02/16 15:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15.02.16 at 15:53, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 15/02/16 14:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 15.02.16 at 15:38, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15/02/16 09:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12.02.16 at 18:42, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/02/16 17:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05.02.16 at 14:42, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>   #define X86_FEATURE_MWAITX        ( 3*32+29) /*   MWAIT extension
>>>>>>>>>> (MONITORX/MWAITX) */
>>>>>>>>>>> Why not exposed to HVM (also for _MWAIT as I now notice)?
>>>>>>>>>> Because that is a good chunk of extra work to support.  We would need to
>>>>>>>>>> use 4K monitor widths, and extra p2m handling.
>>>>>>>>> I don't understand: The base (_MWAIT) feature being exposed to
>>>>>>>>> guests today, and kernels making use of the feature when available
>>>>>>>>> suggests to me that things work. Are you saying you know
>>>>>>>>> otherwise? (And if there really is a reason to mask the feature all of
>>>>>>>>> the sudden, this should again be justified in the commit message.)
>>>>>>>> PV guests had it clobbered by Xen in traps.c
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> HVM guests have:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vmx.c:
>>>>>>>>      case EXIT_REASON_MWAIT_INSTRUCTION:
>>>>>>>>      case EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION:
>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>      hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
>>>>>>>>          break;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and svm.c:
>>>>>>>>      case VMEXIT_MONITOR:
>>>>>>>>      case VMEXIT_MWAIT:
>>>>>>>>          hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_invalid_op, HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
>>>>>>>>          break;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't see how a guest could actually use this feature.
>>>>>>> Do you see the respective intercepts getting enabled anywhere?
>>>>>>> (I don't outside of nested code, which I didn't check in detail.)
>>>>>> Yes - the intercepts are always enabled to prevent the guest actually
>>>>>> putting the processor to sleep.
>>>>> Hmm, you're right, somehow I've managed to ignore the relevant
>>>>> lines grep reported. Yet - how do things work then, without the
>>>>> MWAIT feature flag currently getting cleared?
>>>> I have never observed it being used.  Do you have some local patches in
>>>> the SLES hypervisor?
>>>>
>>>> There is some gross layer violation in xen/enlighten.c to pretend that
>>>> MWAIT is present to trick the ACPI code into evaluating _CST() methods
>>>> to report back to Xen.  (This is yet another PV-ism which will cause a
>>>> headache for a DMLite dom0)
>>> Yes indeed. CC-ing Roger, and Boris.
>> Yes, all this is indeed not very nice, and we would ideally like to get
>> rid of it on PVHv2.

We will have to come up with something else: AIUI the whole point of 
xen_check_mwait() is to come up with proper ECX and EDX values for the 
MWAIT CPUID leaf. Those value are expected to be reported from 
xen_cpuid() pv_op so that acpi_processor_ffh_state_probe_cpu() can set C 
states structures properly.

The problem is that PVH executes CPUID instruction natively. (And so 
this must have been broken on PVHv1 as well).

-boris


>>
>> Could we use the acpica tools (acpidump/acpixtract/acpiexec/...) in
>> order to fetch this information from user-space and send it to Xen using
>> privcmd?
>>
>> AFAIK those tools work on most OSes (or at least the ones we care about
>> as Dom0).
> In general, we can't rely on userspace evaluation of AML.
>
> For trivial AML which evaluates to a constant, it could be interpreted
> by userspace, but anything accessing system resources will need
> evaluating by the kernel.
>
> ~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-18 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 139+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-05 13:41 [PATCH RFC v2 00/30] x86: Improvements to cpuid handling for guests Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] xen/x86: Drop X86_FEATURE_3DNOW_ALT Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] xen/x86: Do not store VIA/Cyrix/Centaur CPU features Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] xen/x86: Drop cpuinfo_x86.x86_power Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] xen/x86: Improvements to pv_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] xen/public: Export cpu featureset information in the public API Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:27   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:08     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 13:34       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-19 17:29   ` Joao Martins
2016-02-19 17:55     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-19 22:03       ` Joao Martins
2016-02-20 16:17         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-20 17:39           ` Joao Martins
2016-02-20 19:17             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-22 18:50               ` Joao Martins
2016-02-05 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] xen/x86: Script to automatically process featureset information Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:36   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 16:43     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] xen/x86: Collect more cpuid feature leaves Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:38   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] xen/x86: Mask out unknown features from Xen's capabilities Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 16:48     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 17:14       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:12         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] xen/x86: Store antifeatures inverted in a featureset Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 16:47   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 16:50     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 17:15       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] xen/x86: Annotate VM applicability in featureset Andrew Cooper
2016-02-12 17:05   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-12 17:42     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15  9:20       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 14:38         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:50           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 14:53             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:02               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:41                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 19:02                   ` Is: PVH dom0 - MWAIT detection logic to get deeper C-states exposed in ACPI AML code. Was:Re: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-17 19:58                     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-18 15:02                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-02-18 15:12                       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18 16:24                         ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-02-18 16:48                           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18 17:03                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-02-18 22:08                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-18 15:16                       ` David Vrabel
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] xen/x86: Calculate maximum host and guest featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 13:37   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 14:57     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:07       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:52         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] xen/x86: Generate deep dependencies of features Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:06   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:28     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:52       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 16:09         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 16:27           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 19:07             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16  9:54               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:25                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 10:42                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] xen/x86: Clear dependent features when clearing a cpu cap Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:53   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 15:33     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 14:56   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] xen/x86: Improve disabling of features which have dependencies Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] xen/x86: Improvements to in-hypervisor cpuid sanity checks Andrew Cooper
2016-02-15 15:43   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-15 17:12     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16 10:06       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:43         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 10:55           ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 14:02             ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 14:45               ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:17                 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-18 13:23                   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] x86/cpu: Move set_cpumask() calls into c_early_init() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16 14:10   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:45     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 10:58       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:41         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] x86/cpu: Common infrastructure for levelling context switching Andrew Cooper
2016-02-16 14:15   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17  8:15     ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:46       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 19:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] x86/cpu: Rework AMD masking MSR setup Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  7:40   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:56     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] x86/cpu: Rework Intel masking/faulting setup Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  7:57   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 10:59     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] x86/cpu: Context switch cpuid masks and faulting state in context_switch() Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  8:06   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] x86/pv: Provide custom cpumasks for PV domains Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  8:13   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 11:03     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 11:14       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-18 12:48         ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] x86/domctl: Update PV domain cpumasks when setting cpuid policy Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  8:22   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 12:13     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] xen+tools: Export maximum host and guest cpu featuresets via SYSCTL Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-17  8:30   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 12:17     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 12:23       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] tools/libxc: Modify bitmap operations to take void pointers Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-08 11:40     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-08 16:23   ` Tim Deegan
2016-02-08 16:36     ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-10 10:07       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-10 10:18         ` Ian Campbell
2016-02-18 13:37           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 20:06         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] tools/libxc: Use public/featureset.h for cpuid policy generation Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] tools/libxc: Expose the automatically generated cpu featuremask information Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:12   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 16:15     ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] tools: Utility for dealing with featuresets Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:13   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] tools/libxc: Wire a featureset through to cpuid policy logic Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:13   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] tools/libxc: Use featuresets rather than guesswork Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 16:13   ` Wei Liu
2016-02-17  8:55   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:03     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 13:19       ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 13:42 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] tools/libxc: Calculate xstate cpuid leaf from guest information Andrew Cooper
2016-02-05 14:28   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-05 15:22     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-08 17:26 ` [PATCH v2.5 31/30] Fix PV guest XSAVE handling with levelling Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17  9:02   ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-17 13:06     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-02-17 13:36       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C5F04A.2020809@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).