From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>, bp@alien8.de
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:34:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C71A03.7030105@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455887316-9223-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org>
On 19/02/16 13:08, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I originally set out to rename paravirt_enabled() to paravirt_legacy()
> but we instead decided to remove paravirt_enabled() completely. Although
> I have some linker table work which will help make this cleaner, instead
> of waiting for that to go in, just remove the known cases that should
> be safe for paravirt_enabled() and also replace it for the subarch
> use.
I don't understand the purpose of this series. How is replacing "if
(A)" with "if (B)" an improvement?
Using the hardware subarch in this way looks like paravirt_enabled()
with a slightly different flavour and I don't think this is that useful
to determine if certain hardware features should be used.
I think you should consider a finer-grained set of feature bits. e.g.,
platform_has_pc_rtc() and platform_has_tboot() etc.
David
>
> While at it, document the subarch to avoid any possible misuses.
>
> Luis R. Rodriguez (9):
> x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch
> tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly
> x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots
> x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch
> apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use
> x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled()
> x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around
> x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check
> pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 6 ------
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 5 -----
> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/head.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c | 6 ------
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 4 +---
> drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c | 4 +++-
> tools/lguest/lguest.c | 4 ++--
> 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-19 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 13:08 [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:19 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 13:40 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 14:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/init: make ebda depend on PC subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 15:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 20:58 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 22:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-20 0:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 14:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/cpu/intel: replace paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/rtc: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch check Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:22 ` [Xen-devel] " Juergen Gross
2016-02-19 14:48 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 6:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-22 10:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-22 14:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-02-22 23:12 ` [Xen-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:27 ` David Vrabel
2016-02-19 13:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with subarch checks Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-02-19 13:34 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2016-02-19 14:36 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] x86/init: replace paravirt_enabled() were possible Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C71A03.7030105@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).