From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/2] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:06:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CC3D40.8050502@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456216452-3745-2-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com>
On 23/02/16 08:34, Feng Wu wrote:
> This is the core logic handling for VT-d posted-interrupts. Basically it
> deals with how and when to update posted-interrupts during the following
> scenarios:
> - vCPU is preempted
> - vCPU is slept
> - vCPU is blocked
>
> When vCPU is preempted/slept, we update the posted-interrupts during
> scheduling by introducing two new architecutral scheduler hooks:
> vmx_pi_switch_from() and vmx_pi_switch_to(). When vCPU is blocked, we
> introduce a new architectural hook: arch_vcpu_block() to update
> posted-interrupts descriptor.
>
> Besides that, before VM-entry, we will make sure the 'NV' filed is set
> to 'posted_intr_vector' and the vCPU is not in any blocking lists, which
> is needed when vCPU is running in non-root mode. The reason we do this check
> is because we change the posted-interrupts descriptor in vcpu_block(),
> however, we don't change it back in vcpu_unblock() or when vcpu_block()
> directly returns due to event delivery (in fact, we don't need to do it
> in the two places, that is why we do it before VM-Entry).
>
> When we handle the lazy context switch for the following two scenarios:
> - Preempted by a tasklet, which uses in an idle context.
> - the prev vcpu is in offline and no new available vcpus in run queue.
> We don't change the 'SN' bit in posted-interrupt descriptor, this
> may incur spurious PI notification events, but since PI notification
> event is only sent when 'ON' is clear, and once the PI notificatoin
> is sent, ON is set by hardware, hence no more notification events
> before 'ON' is clear. Besides that, spurious PI notification events are
> going to happen from time to time in Xen hypervisor, such as, when
> guests trap to Xen and PI notification event happens, there is
> nothing Xen actually needs to do about it, the interrupts will be
> delivered to guest atht the next time we do a VMENTRY.
>
> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> CC: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> CC: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> Suggested-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> Suggested-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
And you can retain my Acked-by wrt the scheduler bits if you make any
further changes to the non-scheduler parts that would require dropping
the Reviewed-by.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 8:34 [PATCH v13 0/2] Add VT-d Posted-Interrupts support Feng Wu
2016-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v13 1/2] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling Feng Wu
2016-02-23 11:06 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2016-02-24 1:01 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-23 16:34 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-24 1:32 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-24 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-24 3:01 ` Doug Goldstein
2016-02-24 3:09 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-24 12:09 ` George Dunlap
2016-02-24 12:49 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-26 1:30 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-26 8:28 ` Jan Beulich
2016-02-26 9:06 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-25 2:46 ` Wu, Feng
2016-02-23 8:34 ` [PATCH v13 2/2] Add a command line parameter for VT-d posted-interrupts Feng Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56CC3D40.8050502@citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).