From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/23] XENVER_build_id: Provide ld-embedded build-ids (v10) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:13:11 +0000 Message-ID: <56CE00C7.9000808@citrix.com> References: <1455300361-13092-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1455300361-13092-14-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <56C381E9.7030002@citrix.com> <20160224185245.GA18149@char.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160224185245.GA18149@char.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , jinsong.liu@alibaba-inc.com, Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, mpohlack@amazon.de, ross.lagerwall@citrix.com, Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Daniel De Graaf , Keir Fraser , sasha.levin@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 24/02/16 18:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S >>> index f501a2f..5cf180f 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S >>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S >>> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ OUTPUT_ARCH(FORMAT) >>> PHDRS >>> { >>> text PT_LOAD /* XXX should be AT ( XEN_PHYS_START ) */ ; >>> +#if defined(BUILD_ID) >>> + note PT_NOTE ; >>> +#endif >>> } >>> SECTIONS >>> { >>> @@ -53,6 +56,16 @@ SECTIONS >>> _erodata = .; /* End of read-only data */ >>> } :text >>> >>> +#if defined(BUILD_ID) >>> + .note : { >>> + __note_gnu_build_id_start = .; >>> + *(.note.gnu.build-id) >>> + __note_gnu_build_id_end = .; >>> + *(.note) >>> + *(.note.*) >>> + } :text >>> +#endif >> This data really should be contained inside rodata. > I get (I replace :text with :rodata) and got: > ld: section `.note' assigned to non-existent phdr `rodata' > > Which makes sense as there are only two PHDRS. Where you suggesting that > the .note should be part of the .rodata section? Jan wanted this to be > in its own section (.note). > > Are you suggesting to add another one PHDR? (If so, then mkelf32 has to be modified, > and for EFI I think it will have to have some #ifdef machinery to make it work). I was just suggesting moving _erodata down a little to cover .note Whatever happens patching-wise, this build ID is constant and will want to remain so. ~Andrew