From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Xentrace on Xilinx ARM Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:32:51 +0000 Message-ID: <56DF1AD3.4050404@citrix.com> References: <1457192589.2959.603.camel@citrix.com> <1457440918.3102.193.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3316151194229725629==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Paul Sujkov , Ben Sanda Cc: George Dunlap , Dario Faggioli , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Julien Grall , "stefano.stabellini" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============3316151194229725629== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040202060706070705060909" --------------040202060706070705060909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/03/16 18:28, Paul Sujkov wrote: > Hi Ben, > > looks like you've done everything I did. I'm far from my working > laptop today, so I can post my work on this issue only tomorrow so you > can look through the code, compare and estimate solutions. > > Regarding ARM build, I'm using xenalyze as both host tool (x86 build, > e.g. for gnuplot scatterplot graphs) and target tool (ARM, for fast > summary check); but since we're working with Xen 4.5, I'm building it > outside Xen source tree with a custom Makefile. xenalyse should be able to be run as a separate tool, and on a different architecture. All it does is annotate the binary trace file. I don't think there is much change between what's now in-tree and what was out of tree in the 4.5 timeframe. ~Andrew --------------040202060706070705060909 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 08/03/16 18:28, Paul Sujkov wrote:
Hi Ben,

looks like you've done everything I did. I'm far from my working laptop today, so I can post my work on this issue only tomorrow so you can look through the code, compare and estimate solutions.

Regarding ARM build, I'm using xenalyze as both host tool (x86 build, e.g. for gnuplot scatterplot graphs) and target tool (ARM, for fast summary check); but since we're working with Xen 4.5, I'm building it outside Xen source tree with a custom Makefile.

xenalyse should be able to be run as a separate tool, and on a different architecture.  All it does is annotate the binary trace file.

I don't think there is much change between what's now in-tree and what was out of tree in the 4.5 timeframe.

~Andrew
--------------040202060706070705060909-- --===============3316151194229725629== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK --===============3316151194229725629==--