xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	lguest@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Joey Lee <jlee@suse.com>, Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	kozerkov@paral
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with platform legacy quirk
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:37:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5707A618.7040608@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570764F8.6020902@suse.com>

On 04/08/2016 03:59 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/04/16 09:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/04/16 08:56, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay. Another idea (not sure whether this is really a good one):
>>>>
>>>> Add X86_SUBARCH_XEN_DOM0. As hardware_subarch is 32 bits wide I don't
>>>> think the number of subarchs is a scarce resource. :-)
>> This would mean bumping the x86 boot protocol, we shouldn't take that
>> lightly, but given that in this case the new subarch would really only
>> be set by the kernel (or future loaders for perhaps HVMLite) I'd think
>> this is not such an intrusive alternative.
> I think adding an own subarch for dom0 isn't that bad. It really is
> different from domU as dom0 has per default access to the real hardware
> (or at least to most of it).

Can we do this (overwrite quirks) in x86_init_ops.arch_setup? I'd really 
like to avoid adding a what essentially is a sub-subarch.

-boris

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-08 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07  0:06 [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 11:25   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-07 22:36     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:41   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with platform legacy quirk Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:42   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-13 23:08     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 12:55   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08  0:32     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  5:18       ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  6:29         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  6:38           ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  6:56             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  7:13               ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  7:36                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  7:59                   ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 12:37                     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-04-08 18:45                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 12:25           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] x86, ACPI: move ACPI_FADT_NO_CMOS_RTC check to ACPI boot code Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] x86/init: use a platform legacy quirk for ebda Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:44   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 21:07     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] tools/lguest: force disable tboot and apm Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-11  3:32   ` Rusty Russell
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 13:08   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07 22:31     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] x86/cpu/intel: remove not needed paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with legacy device check Luis R. Rodriguez
     [not found]   ` <1459987594-5434-12-git-send-email-mcgrof-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-07  9:46     ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 21:42       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] x86, ACPI: parse ACPI_FADT_LEGACY_DEVICES Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] x86/init: rename ebda code file Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] x86/paravirt: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 13:24 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Juergen Gross
2016-04-07 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] x86/init: rename ebda code file Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 10:23   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5707A618.7040608@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=glin@suse.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kozerkov@paral \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).