From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
paul.durrant@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, keir@xen.org
Subject: Re: [for-4.7] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:09:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570F3429.8070405@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570F3121.2080009@bitdefender.com>
On 14/04/16 07:56, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> This indeed doesn't guard against LOCKed instructions being run in
> parallel with and without emulation, however that is a case that should
> almost never occur - at least not with introspection, where currently
> all emulation happens as a result of EPT faults - so either all
> instructions hitting a restricted page are emulated, or all ar run
> directly. As long as all emulation can safely run in parallel and all
> parallel non-emulation is also safe, it should be alright. But, yes,
> this patch doesn't cover the case you're mentioning.
What about grant pages? There could be parallel accesses from different
domains, one being introspected, the other not.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-13 12:26 [for-4.7] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 4:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 5:56 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 6:09 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2016-04-14 6:31 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 7:46 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14 8:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14 8:18 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14 8:25 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 8:07 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14 8:09 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 9:08 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:33 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:44 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 16:00 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 16:11 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 8:51 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:40 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 10:35 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-14 11:43 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14 16:09 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:45 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-18 12:14 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-18 16:45 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-19 11:01 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-19 16:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-26 16:03 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-26 17:23 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-26 17:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-27 6:25 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-27 7:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-27 6:22 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-27 7:14 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 14:20 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 14:30 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-03 14:41 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 15:13 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-04 11:32 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-04 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-05 9:25 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-05 16:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-13 15:27 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-13 15:51 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570F3429.8070405@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).