xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	paul.durrant@citrix.com, keir@xen.org
Subject: Re: [for-4.7] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:07:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570F4FC0.8050407@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570F3121.2080009@bitdefender.com>

On 14/04/2016 06:56, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>
>>> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
>>> @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ struct domain *domain_create(domid_t domid, unsigned int domcr_flags,
>>  >
>>      >TRACE_1D(TRC_DOM0_DOM_ADD, d->domain_id);
>>  >
>>> +    percpu_rwlock_resource_init(&d->arch.emulate_lock, emulate_locked_rwlock);
>> I cannot see how this would build on ARM.
> I'll add separate functions for ARM and x86, with a no-op for ARM.

Please move this line into arch_domain_create() arch/x86/domain.c

Strictly speaking, common code should never reference ->arch.  The bits
of ->arch which common code does touch should move up into common struct
domain.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-13 12:26 [for-4.7] x86/emulate: synchronize LOCKed instruction emulation Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  4:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14  5:56   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  6:09     ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14  6:31       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  7:46         ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14  8:01           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14  8:18             ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-14  8:25               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  8:07     ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-04-14  8:09       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14  9:08     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:33       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:44     ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 16:00       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 16:11         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14  8:51   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:31     ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:40       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 10:35 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-14 11:43   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 15:40     ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:45       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-14 16:09         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-14 15:45       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-14 16:08         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-18 12:14           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-18 16:45             ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-19 11:01               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-19 16:35                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-26 16:03                   ` George Dunlap
2016-04-26 17:23                     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-04-26 17:39                       ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-27  6:25                         ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-27  7:36                           ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-27  6:22                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-27  7:14                         ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 14:20                           ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 14:30                             ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-03 14:41                               ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-03 15:13                                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-04 11:32                                   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-04 13:42                                     ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-05  9:25                                       ` Razvan Cojocaru
2016-05-05 16:38                                         ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-13 15:27 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-13 15:51   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570F4FC0.8050407@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).