From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: pvops xen_blkfront does not enforce device names
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:43:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57233AD1.7030301@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57232BD5.6080701@citrix.com>
On 29/04/16 10:39, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 29/04/16 08:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 29.04.16 at 08:45, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:28:45PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>>> Why does xen_blkfront not enforce kernel device names from domU.cfg?
>>>> In my PV domU.cfg I still have something like this:
>>>> disk=[ 'file:/path,hda,w' ]
>>>>
>>>> With pvops and xen_blkfront I get xvda.
>>>> With xenlinux and xenblk I get hda.
>>> It has no business subverting the hda device names which
>>> are specifically for legacy devices.
>> That's one view. The other is that people moving from XenoLinux to
>> pv-ops are in trouble without it. How did you (or Citrix, if anyone of
>> them looks) deal with this when doing the transition?
> XenServer always named its PV disks as xvda etc.
The toolstack has no business trying to control how the guest chooses to
name its block devices. The device name is private information to the
guest.
It should continue to function in exactly the same way even if the guest
admin edits their udev rules to rename it to something crazy like "&&&&".
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-26 13:28 pvops xen_blkfront does not enforce device names Olaf Hering
2016-04-29 6:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-29 7:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 7:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-04-29 11:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-04-29 9:39 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-29 10:43 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-04-29 11:27 ` Olaf Hering
2016-04-29 13:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57233AD1.7030301@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).