From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/shadow: account for ioreq server pages before complaining about not found mapping
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:28:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5723536C.7040702@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572333CF02000078000E719C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 29/04/16 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> prepare_ring_for_helper(), just like share_xen_page_with_guest(),
> takes a write reference on the page, and hence should similarly be
> accounted for when determining whether to log a complaint.
>
> This requires using recursive locking for the ioreq server lock, as the
> offending invocation of sh_remove_all_mappings() is down the call stack
> from hvm_set_ioreq_server_state(). (While not strictly needed to be
> done in all other instances too, convert all of them for consistency.)
>
> At once improve the usefulness of the shadow error message: Log all
> values involved in triggering it as well as the GFN (to aid
> understanding which guest page it is that there is a problem with - in
> cases like the one here the GFN is invariant across invocations, while
> the MFN obviously can [and will] vary).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
IMO, this is a 4.7 candidate. I already had a TODO list item of working
out why the shadow code was always complaining.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, albeit with one
further suggestion.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/flushtlb.h>
> #include <asm/shadow.h>
> +#include <asm/hvm/ioreq.h>
> #include <xen/numa.h>
> #include "private.h"
>
> @@ -2591,7 +2592,8 @@ int sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p(str
> /* Remove all mappings of a guest frame from the shadow tables.
> * Returns non-zero if we need to flush TLBs. */
>
> -static int sh_remove_all_mappings(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn)
> +static int sh_remove_all_mappings(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn,
> + unsigned long gfn)
It would be nice if we could use gfn_t rather than having more unsigned
longs.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 8:13 [PATCH] x86/shadow: account for ioreq server pages before complaining about not found mapping Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 8:29 ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-29 9:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 9:35 ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-29 12:28 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-04-29 12:39 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-29 13:12 ` Wei Liu
[not found] <20160429171022.GB97240@deinos.phlegethon.org>
2016-04-29 17:21 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5723536C.7040702@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).