From: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
=Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@arm.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vikrams@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm/acpi: Add Server Base System Architecture UART support
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:14:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <574EFBED.1000804@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574EE7EC.5080205@arm.com>
On 06/01/2016 08:49 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Shanker,
>
> On 31/05/16 15:02, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
>> The ARM Server Base System Architecture describes a generic UART
>> interface. It doesn't support clock control registers, modem
>> control, DMA and hardware flow control features. So, extend the
>> driver probe() to handle SBSA interface and skip the accessing
>> PL011 registers that are not described in SBSA document.
>
> Please mention the version of the spec in the commit message.
>
Sure, I'll do.
>> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> Don't access UART registers that are not part of SBSA document.
>> Move setting baudrate function to a separate function.
>>
>> xen/drivers/char/pl011.c | 56
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/char/pl011.c b/xen/drivers/char/pl011.c
>> index 1212d5c..b57f3b0 100644
>> --- a/xen/drivers/char/pl011.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/pl011.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static struct pl011 {
>> /* struct timer timer; */
>> /* unsigned int timeout_ms; */
>> /* bool_t probing, intr_works; */
>> + bool sbsa; /* ARM SBSA generic interface */
>> } pl011_com = {0};
>>
>> /* These parity settings can be ORed directly into the LCR. */
>> @@ -81,17 +82,10 @@ static void pl011_interrupt(int irq, void *data,
> struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void __init pl011_init_preirq(struct serial_port *port)
>> +static void __init pl011_init_baudrate(struct serial_port *port)
>> {
>> struct pl011 *uart = port->uart;
>> unsigned int divisor;
>> - unsigned int cr;
>> -
>> - /* No interrupts, please. */
>> - pl011_write(uart, IMSC, 0);
>> -
>> - /* Definitely no DMA */
>> - pl011_write(uart, DMACR, 0x0);
>>
>> /* Line control and baud-rate generator. */
>> if ( uart->baud != BAUD_AUTO )
>> @@ -114,6 +108,24 @@ static void __init pl011_init_preirq(struct
> serial_port *port)
>> | FEN
>> | ((uart->stop_bits - 1) << 3)
>> | uart->parity);
>> +}
>
> As mentioned on the previous version, the code to set/read the baudrate is just wrong. The clock frequency is hardcoded rather than read from the firmware.
>
> However, the baudrate is always set to BAUD_AUTO for this driver, and never used after. So all this code should be dropped.
>
SPCR (non-SBSA) spec has baudrate, stop and parity information, I think we should support setting the correct baudrate according to SPCR table instead of removing the code.
I need your opinion on this.
>> @@ -315,6 +331,7 @@ static int __init pl011_acpi_uart_init(const void
> *data)
>> {
>> acpi_status status;
>> struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr = NULL;
>> + bool sbsa;
>> int res;
>>
>> status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
>> @@ -326,17 +343,21 @@ static int __init pl011_acpi_uart_init(const void
> *data)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + sbsa = (spcr->interface_type == ACPI_DBG2_SBSA_32) ? true : false;
>
> sbsa = (spcr->interface_type == ACPI_DBG2_SBSA_32);
>
> However, can you explain why you kept ACPI_DBG2_SBSA_32 and not ACPI_DBG2_SBSA? The former is deprecated whilst the latter is the official one.
>
Qualcomm Technologies QDF2XXX ARM SBSA serial port hardware require registers access should be 32-bit, so our firmware sets interface type to ACPI_DBG2_SBSA_32.
I would like to support both the interfaces (ACPI_DBG2_SBSA_32/ACPI_DBG2_SBSA) If you are okay.
> Regards,
>
--
Shanker Donthineni
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 14:02 [PATCH v2] arm/acpi: Add Server Base System Architecture UART support Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-01 6:47 ` Wei Chen
2016-06-01 12:21 ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-01 13:49 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 15:14 ` Shanker Donthineni [this message]
2016-06-01 15:40 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-01 15:56 ` Andre Przywara
2016-06-01 16:18 ` Julien Grall
2016-06-02 14:51 ` Shanker Donthineni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=574EFBED.1000804@codeaurora.org \
--to=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Wei.Chen@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=pelcan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=vikrams@codeaurora.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).