From: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Update to use a .config file
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:08:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57610D0E.4050805@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614153557.GE9456@char.us.oracle.com>
On 06/14/2016 04:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:02:44PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> Remove the old --xen-debug option, and instead, require the user to pass
>> a .config file matching the original build's .config.
>
> Hm, that throws this off a bit for the older hypervisors (to which
> I had backported livepatch). Perhaps we could add some logic to
> check if common/Kconfig exist?
At this point rather than adding extra logic to support different
still-experimental versions, I'd rather just have a different branch.
Maybe have a branch per Xen release?
>
> And I also wonder if the --xen-debug option removal should be a seperate
> patch?
>
Well the two are related -- the motivation to use the .config is because
the debug flag is now controlled by the .config rather than the
command-line argument.
--
Ross Lagerwall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-10 11:02 [PATCH 1/3] Don't accept fuzz when patching Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-10 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] Update to use a .config file Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-14 15:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-15 8:08 ` Ross Lagerwall [this message]
2016-06-15 14:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-07-14 8:05 ` Ross Lagerwall
2016-07-15 13:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-07-16 1:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-07-18 9:33 ` Ross Lagerwall
2016-07-18 10:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-10 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] Update README.md Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-14 15:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-06-13 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] Don't accept fuzz when patching George Dunlap
2016-06-13 10:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-13 10:57 ` George Dunlap
2016-06-13 10:23 ` Ross Lagerwall
2016-06-14 15:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57610D0E.4050805@citrix.com \
--to=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).