Re: Next 4.6.x stable release, numbering, qemu-tag

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>]

On 15/06/16 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 15.06.16 at 11:35, <george.dunlap@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 15/06/16 08:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>>> As said on IRC this morning, while I continue to by unconvinced of the
>>> arguments, being the only one wanting to stick with 4.6.2 I'm not going
>>> to argue any further on this - be it 4.6.3 then. The only thing I would
>>> really like to ask is that this time (as should have happened in the first
>>> place), before tagging respective trees, everyone please make sure
>>> everything intended to be in the tree they're responsible for indeed is
>>> there. I really want to be able to rely on everybody having their trees
>>> (or parts thereof) under control.
>>
>> I think this is an unreasonable expectation -- how is someone supposed
>> to know whether a new critical issue is going to be reported seconds
>> after they sign and push the tag?  It amounts to saying, "Please make
>> sure there are no bugs in your tree."
> 
> I certainly didn't mean that, and I think it is reasonably clear even
> without me having said so explicitly that my expectation only applies
> to already known items. After all (aiui) what we're talking about here
> are not issues that showed up in the last minute, but just fell between
> the cracks.
> 
>> The version of qemu-xen that was tagged with 4.6 had been through
>> several rounds of RCs, months of osstesting, and even through a slew of
>> builds on Travis (which does build Ubuntu, but apparently just not the
>> bleeding-edge version).  I only happened to notice it as I was trying to
>> get patches for raisin for 4.7.
> 
> The mere fact that 4.6.0 and 4.6.1 exhibited the same issue (and,
> from what you're saying now, which is different from what I've
> understood before, already did when they were cut) would make
> dealing with the issue a non-release-critical one for my taste. IOW,
> if a new version of Ubuntu showed up after 4.6.1, then fixing the
> issue in 4.6.2 (now 4.6.3) would indeed be rather desirable. If,
> however, that release was around already at the time 4.6.1 got
> cut, then I don't see why this is so urgent a problem to address.

And this is exactly what happened -- the version of Ubuntu which breaks
is 16.04, which (as the name indicates) came out in April 2016 -- two
months after 4.6.1. :-)

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel