xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Philip Elcan <pelcan@codeaurora.org>,
	Vikram Sethi <vikrams@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/10] arm/gic-v3: Parse per-cpu redistributor entry in GICC subtable
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:47:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57711241.7090801@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466963303-10850-5-git-send-email-shankerd@codeaurora.org>

Hi Shanker,

On 26/06/16 18:48, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> The redistributor address can be specified either as part of GICC or
> GICR subtable depending on the power domain. The current driver
> doesn't support parsing redistributor entry that is defined in GICC
> subtable. The GIC CPU subtable entry holds the associated Redistributor
> base address if it is not on always-on power domain.
>
> The per CPU Redistributor size is not defined in ACPI specification.
> Set it's size to SZ_256K if the GIC hardware is capable of Direct

s/it's/its/, although I would use "the".

> Virtual LPI Injection feature otherwise SZ_128K.

"Set the size to SZ_256K if the GIC hardware is supporting Direct 
Virtual LPI injection, SZ_128K otherwise".

>
> This patch adds necessary code to handle both types of Redistributors
> base addresses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>    Edited commit text and fixed white spaces.
>    Added a new function for parsing per CPU Redistributor entry.
>
>   xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c             | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h         |  1 +
>   xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h |  1 +
>   3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
> index 0471fea..3977244 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
> @@ -659,6 +659,10 @@ static int __init gicv3_populate_rdist(void)
>                           smp_processor_id(), i, ptr);
>                   return 0;
>               }
> +
> +            if ( gicv3.rdist_regions[i].single_rdist )
> +                break;
> +
>               if ( gicv3.rdist_stride )
>                   ptr += gicv3.rdist_stride;
>               else
> @@ -1282,14 +1286,21 @@ static int gicv3_iomem_deny_access(const struct domain *d)
>   }
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static void __init gic_acpi_add_rdist_region(u64 base_addr, u32 size)
> +static void __init
> +gic_acpi_add_rdist_region(u64 base_addr, u32 size, bool single_rdist)
>   {
>       unsigned int idx = gicv3.rdist_count++;
>
> +    gicv3.rdist_regions[idx].single_rdist = single_rdist;
>       gicv3.rdist_regions[idx].base = base_addr;
>       gicv3.rdist_regions[idx].size = size;
>   }
>
> +static inline bool gic_dist_supports_dvis(void)
> +{
> +    return !!(readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_DVIS);
> +}
> +
>   static int gicv3_make_hwdom_madt(const struct domain *d, u32 offset)
>   {
>       struct acpi_subtable_header *header;
> @@ -1397,6 +1408,42 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>   }
>
>   static int __init
> +gic_acpi_parse_cpu_redistributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> +                                  const unsigned long end)
> +{
> +    struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor;
> +    u32 size;
> +
> +    processor = (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
> +    if ( BAD_MADT_ENTRY(processor, end) )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    if ( !processor->gicr_base_address )
> +        return -EINVAL;

You already check it in gic_acpi_get_madt_cpu_num, so there is no reason 
to do it again.

> +
> +    if ( processor->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED )
> +    {
> +        size = gic_dist_supports_dvis() ? 4 * SZ_64K : 2 * SZ_64K;
> +        gic_acpi_add_rdist_region(processor->gicr_base_address, size, true);
> +    }

I would revert the condition to avoid one level of indentation. I.e

if ( !(processor->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) )
   return 0;

size = ....
gic_acpi_add...

return 0;

However, it looks like that the other function that parses GICC within 
gic-v3.c (see gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu) does not check if the CPU is usable.

I think we need to have the same parsing behavior on every function.

> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init
> +gic_acpi_get_madt_cpu_num(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> +                                    const unsigned long end)
> +{
> +    struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *cpuif;
> +
> +    cpuif = (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
> +    if ( BAD_MADT_ENTRY(cpuif, end) || !cpuif->gicr_base_address )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init
>   gic_acpi_parse_madt_redistributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>                                     const unsigned long end)
>   {
> @@ -1409,7 +1456,7 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_redistributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>       if ( !rdist->base_address || !rdist->length )
>           return -EINVAL;
>
> -    gic_acpi_add_rdist_region(rdist->base_address, rdist->length);
> +    gic_acpi_add_rdist_region(rdist->base_address, rdist->length, false);
>
>       return 0;
>   }
> @@ -1428,6 +1475,7 @@ static void __init gicv3_acpi_init(void)
>   {
>       struct acpi_table_header *table;
>       struct rdist_region *rdist_regs;
> +    bool gicr_table = true;
>       acpi_status status;
>       int count;
>
> @@ -1457,8 +1505,18 @@ static void __init gicv3_acpi_init(void)
>       count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT, sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
>                                  gic_acpi_get_madt_redistributor_num, table,
>                                  ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_REDISTRIBUTOR, 0);
> -    if ( count <= 0 )
> -        panic("GICv3: No valid GICR entries exists");
> +
> +    /* Count the total number of CPU interface entries */
> +    if (count <= 0) {

Coding style:

if ( count <= 0 )
{

> +        count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
> +                                   sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
> +                                   gic_acpi_get_madt_cpu_num,
> +                                   table, ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, 0);

Please use acpi_table_parse_madt.

> +        if (count <= 0)

Coding style:

if ( count <= 0 )

> +            panic("GICv3: No valid GICR entries exists");
> +
> +        gicr_table = false;
> +    }
>
>       if ( count > MAX_RDIST_COUNT )
>           panic("GICv3: Number of redistributor regions is more than"
> @@ -1470,11 +1528,19 @@ static void __init gicv3_acpi_init(void)
>
>       gicv3.rdist_regions = rdist_regs;
>
> -    /* Parse always-on power domain Re-distributor entries */
> -    count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
> -                               sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
> -                               gic_acpi_parse_madt_redistributor, table,
> -                               ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_REDISTRIBUTOR, count);
> +    if ( gicr_table )
> +        /* Parse always-on power domain Re-distributor entries */
> +        count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
> +                                   sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
> +                                   gic_acpi_parse_madt_redistributor, table,
> +                                   ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_REDISTRIBUTOR, count);

Please use acpi_table_parse_madt.

> +    else
> +        /* Parse Re-distributor entries described in CPU interface table */
> +        count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
> +                                   sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
> +                                   gic_acpi_parse_cpu_redistributor, table,
> +                                   ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, count);

Ditto.

> +
>       if ( count <= 0 )
>           panic("GICv3: Can't get Redistributor entry");
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> index 44b9ef6..fedf1fa 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
>   #define GICD_TYPE_CPUS_SHIFT 5
>   #define GICD_TYPE_CPUS  0x0e0
>   #define GICD_TYPE_SEC   0x400
> +#define GICD_TYPER_DVIS (1U << 18)
>
>   #define GICC_CTL_ENABLE 0x1
>   #define GICC_CTL_EOI    (0x1 << 9)
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h
> index 6d98491..6bd25a5 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ struct rdist_region {
>       paddr_t base;
>       paddr_t size;
>       void __iomem *map_base;
> +    bool single_rdist;
>   };
>
>   #endif /* __ASM_ARM_GIC_V3_DEFS_H__ */
>

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-27 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-26 17:48 [PATCH V2 00/10] Add support for parsing per CPU Redistributor entry Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] arm/gic-v3: Fix bug in function cmp_rdist() Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 11:03   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 13:41     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] arm/gic-v3: Do early GICD ioremap and clean up Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 11:08   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] arm/gic-v3: Fold GICR subtable parsing into a new function Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 11:26   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 13:50     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 15:40     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 15:41       ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 16:07         ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 16:09           ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 16:17             ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 16:20               ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] arm/gic-v3: Parse per-cpu redistributor entry in GICC subtable Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 11:47   ` Julien Grall [this message]
2016-06-27 14:17     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 15:13       ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] xen/arm: vgic: Use dynamic memory allocation for vgic_rdist_region Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 12:38   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 12:43     ` Andrew Cooper
2016-06-27 14:28     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] arm/gic-v3: Remove an unused macro MAX_RDIST_COUNT Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 13:52   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] arm: vgic: Split vgic_domain_init() functionality into two functions Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 12:45   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] arm/io: Use separate memory allocation for mmio handlers Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 13:55   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] xen/arm: io: Use binary search for mmio handler lookup Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 13:31   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 14:50     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 15:27       ` Julien Grall
2016-06-26 17:48 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] arm/vgic: Change fixed number of mmio handlers to variable number Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-27 13:35   ` Julien Grall
2016-06-27 15:02     ` Shanker Donthineni
2016-06-28 10:51       ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57711241.7090801@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=pelcan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=vikrams@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).