xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen: fix a (latent) cpupool-related race during domain destroy
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:52:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5788DC89.4090009@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468583562.13039.96.camel@citrix.com>

On 15/07/16 13:52, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 12:36 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 15/07/16 12:14, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> In particular, I'm probably not fully understanding, from that
>>> commit
>>> changelog, what is the set of operations/command that I should run
>>> to
>>> check whether or not I reintroduced the issue back.
>> You need to create a domain in a cpupool and destroy it again while
>> some dom0 process still is holding a reference to it (resulting in a
>> zombie domain). Then try to destroy the cpupool.
>>
> Ah, I see. I wasn't get the fact that it needed to be a zombie domain
> from anywhere.
> 
>>> What am I missing?
>> The domain being a zombie domain might change the picture. Moving it
>> to
>> cpupool0 was failing before my patch and it might do so again with
>> your
>> patch applied.
>>
> Mmmm... I don't immediately see the reason why moving a zombie domain
> fails either, but I guess I'll have to try.

Searching through the history I found commit
934e7baa6c12d19cfaf24e8f8e27d6c6a8b8c5e4 which might has removed the
problematic condition (cpupool->n_dom being non-zero while d->cpupool
was NULL already).

> But then, correct me if I'm wrong, the situation is like this:
>  - right now there's a (potential) race between domain's scheduling 
>    data destruction and domain removal from a cpupool;
>  - with my patch, the race goes away, but we risk not being able to 
>    destroy a cpupool with a zombie domain in it.

This one has been observed.

I do remember the following critical cases:

- removing a cpupool with a zombie domain
- shutting down the system with a domain in a cpupool
- not sure about the combination of both cases (shutting down with
  zombie domain in a cpupool): is this even possible without another
  bug in the hypervisor or dom0?

> Therefore, I still think this patch is correct, but I'm up for
> investigating further and finding a way to solve the "zombie in
> cpupool" issue as well.

I'm not saying your patch is wrong. I just wanted to give you a hint
about the history of the stuff you are changing. :-)

If it is working I'd really prefer it over the current situation.


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-15 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-14 16:17 [PATCH v2 0/2] xen: cpupool (small) improvement and (latent) bug fix Dario Faggioli
2016-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xen: fix a (latent) cpupool-related race during domain destroy Dario Faggioli
2016-07-14 17:08   ` Andrew Cooper
2016-07-15  9:38   ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-15 10:14     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-15 10:36       ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-15 11:52         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-15 12:52           ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2016-07-15 14:23             ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 14:03               ` Dario Faggioli
2016-07-18 14:09                 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-28 17:29                   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-08-03 11:54                     ` George Dunlap
2016-08-03 12:27                   ` George Dunlap
2016-07-14 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: cpupool: small optimization when moving between pools Dario Faggioli
2016-07-15  9:39   ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5788DC89.4090009@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).