From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "AL13N" Subject: Re: preparing for 4.3.1 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: <583e5e745935f301334727500c8e2e2f.squirrel@mail.rmail.be> References: <524574FC02000078000F76A2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <525473BD.9050604@citrix.com> <4719592.EaDbUfCW0M@localhost> <5255388B02000078000F9E68@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VTrna-0005O5-61 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 11:19:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5255388B02000078000F9E68@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , M A Young List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>>> On 09.10.13 at 07:50, AL13N wrote: >> Op dinsdag 8 oktober 2013 22:23:32 schreef M A Young: >>> On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> > On 08/10/2013 21:42, AL13N wrote: >>> >> Op vrijdag 27 september 2013 11:07:24 schreef Jan Beulich: >>> >>> Aiming at a release later in October (before Xen Summit I would >>> >>> hope), I'd like to cut RC1 next week. >>> >>> >>> >>> Please indicate any bug fixes that so far may have been missed >>> >>> in the backports already done. >>> >> >>> >> any ETA on this rc1? i'd like to have 4.3.1 on Mageia, but i kindof >>> need >>> >> an >>> >> rc1 before version freeze next week... >>> > >>> > rc1 has been tagged in the tree for 7 days now. >>> > >>> > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/staging-4 >>> > .3 >>> You might get the full version in time for your freeze. According to >>> http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/ there are 5 security updates due for >>> release >>> tomorrow, which might be all the full version is waiting for. >>> >>> Michael Young >> >> ah, i didn't think 4.3.1 would have these patches in... >> >> but if it's been unchanged the last 7 days, does this mean the 3 or so >> patches >> spoken of, in this thread, aren't included? > > I think I said quite clearly in the RC1 announcement that RC2 > will need to wait for IanJ's return, so that the tools side can be > taken care of (where I think we had a couple of additional > backport requests). ah, ic, by this you mean that the rc1 is a tag and is not actually released as a tarball... ( or it is, and i've missed it? )