From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: "zhiyuan.lv@intel.com" <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled.
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:22:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58C021C6.80308@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76ac974773124daaabf32b7467cb0196@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net>
On 3/8/2017 10:06 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Yu
>> Zhang
>> Sent: 08 March 2017 13:32
>> To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> Cc: zhiyuan.lv@intel.com
>> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock
>> after mmio is handled.
>>
>> Routine hvmemul_do_io() may need to peek the p2m type of a gfn to
>> select the ioreq server. For example, operations on gfns with
>> p2m_ioreq_server type will be delivered to a corresponding ioreq
>> server, and this requires that the p2m type not be switched back
>> to p2m_ram_rw during the emulation process. To avoid this race
>> condition, we delay the release of p2m lock in
>> hvm_hap_nested_page_fault()
>> until mmio is handled.
>>
>> Note: previously in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(), put_gfn() was moved
>> before the handling of mmio, due to a deadlock risk between the p2m
>> lock and the event lock(in commit 77b8dfe). Later, a per-event channel
>> lock was introduced in commit de6acb7, to send events. So we do not
>> need to worry about the deadlock issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Your cc-s seem to have been dropped by your mailer (or at least I can't see them in the mail header). You may want to send these again so that relevant folks actually get cc-ed.
Thanks for your remind. Let me try again. This is strange because I had
commented out supress-cc in my git config.
Please ignore this thread, and sorry for the inconvenience. :-)
Yu
> Paul
>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> index ccfae4f..a9db7f7 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> @@ -1870,18 +1870,14 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa,
>> unsigned long gla,
>> (npfec.write_access &&
>> (p2m_is_discard_write(p2mt) || (p2mt == p2m_ioreq_server))) )
>> {
>> - __put_gfn(p2m, gfn);
>> - if ( ap2m_active )
>> - __put_gfn(hostp2m, gfn);
>> -
>> rc = 0;
>> if ( unlikely(is_pvh_domain(currd)) )
>> - goto out;
>> + goto out_put_gfn;
>>
>> if ( !handle_mmio_with_translation(gla, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT, npfec) )
>> hvm_inject_hw_exception(TRAP_gp_fault, 0);
>> rc = 1;
>> - goto out;
>> + goto out_put_gfn;
>> }
>>
>> /* Check if the page has been paged out */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 13:32 [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/ioreq server: Introduce HVMMEM_ioreq_server mem type Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 14:06 ` Paul Durrant
2017-03-08 15:22 ` Yu Zhang [this message]
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] x86/ioreq server: Add DMOP to map guest ram with p2m_ioreq_server to an ioreq server Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] x86/ioreq server: Handle read-modify-write cases for p2m_ioreq_server pages Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] ix86/ioreq server: Asynchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 13:32 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] x86/ioreq server: Synchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries when an ioreq server unmaps Yu Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-08 15:33 [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/ioreq server: Introduce HVMMEM_ioreq_server mem type Yu Zhang
2017-03-08 15:33 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled Yu Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58C021C6.80308@linux.intel.com \
--to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).