xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>,
	"Lv, Zhiyuan" <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/6] x86/ioreq server: Asynchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries.
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:22:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58E519AB.7050004@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZaqtrk9Q17Fm+v7yKsQU-ospGXeKjwmkSSiDvdOmP67fA@mail.gmail.com>



On 4/5/2017 10:41 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> After an ioreq server has unmapped, the remaining p2m_ioreq_server
>> entries need to be reset back to p2m_ram_rw. This patch does this
>> asynchronously with the current p2m_change_entry_type_global()
>> interface.
>>
>> New field entry_count is introduced in struct p2m_domain, to record
>> the number of p2m_ioreq_server p2m page table entries. One nature of
>> these entries is that they only point to 4K sized page frames, because
>> all p2m_ioreq_server entries are originated from p2m_ram_rw ones in
>> p2m_change_type_one(). We do not need to worry about the counting for
>> 2M/1G sized pages.
> Assuming that all p2m_ioreq_server entries are *created* by
> p2m_change_type_one() may valid, but can you assume that they are only
> ever *removed* by p2m_change_type_one() (or recalculation)?
>
> What happens, for instance, if a guest balloons out one of the ram
> pages?  I don't immediately see anything preventing a p2m_ioreq_server
> page from being ballooned out, nor anything on the
> decrease_reservation() path decreasing p2m->ioreq.entry_count.  Or did
> I miss something?
>
> Other than that, only one minor comment...

Thanks for your thorough consideration, George. But I do not think we need to worry about this:

If the emulation is in process, the balloon driver cannot get a p2m_ioreq_server page - because
it is already allocated.

And even when emulation is finished, the balloon driver successfully get this page, and triggers
decrease_reservation, the purpose is to remove the current mapping relation between the gfn
and mfn in p2m. So IIUC, p2m_remove_page() will be triggered if everything is goes fine, and then
p2m_set_entry(), which will trigger the recalc logic eventually, either in ept_set_entry() or
p2m_pt_set_entry(). Then the entry_count will be updated in the recalc logic.

>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
>> index a57b385..6ec950a 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c
>> @@ -187,6 +187,15 @@ out:
>>    */
>>   static int hap_enable_log_dirty(struct domain *d, bool_t log_global)
>>   {
>> +    struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d);
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Refuse to turn on global log-dirty mode if
>> +     * there's outstanding p2m_ioreq_server pages.
> Grammar nit: if *there are* outstanding pages.

Oh, right. Thanks

B.R.
Yu
>   -George
>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-05 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-02 12:24 [PATCH v10 0/6] x86/ioreq server: Introduce HVMMEM_ioreq_server mem type Yu Zhang
2017-04-02 12:24 ` [PATCH v10 1/6] x86/ioreq server: Release the p2m lock after mmio is handled Yu Zhang
2017-04-02 12:24 ` [PATCH v10 2/6] x86/ioreq server: Add DMOP to map guest ram with p2m_ioreq_server to an ioreq server Yu Zhang
2017-04-03 14:21   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 13:48   ` George Dunlap
2017-04-02 12:24 ` [PATCH v10 3/6] x86/ioreq server: Add device model wrappers for new DMOP Yu Zhang
2017-04-03  8:13   ` Paul Durrant
2017-04-03  9:28     ` Wei Liu
2017-04-05  6:53       ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05  9:21         ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05  9:22           ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05  9:38             ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 10:08         ` Wei Liu
2017-04-05 10:20           ` Wei Liu
2017-04-05 10:21             ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 10:21           ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 10:33             ` Wei Liu
2017-04-05 10:26               ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 10:46                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 10:50                   ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-02 12:24 ` [PATCH v10 4/6] x86/ioreq server: Handle read-modify-write cases for p2m_ioreq_server pages Yu Zhang
2017-04-02 12:24 ` [PATCH v10 5/6] x86/ioreq server: Asynchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries Yu Zhang
2017-04-03 14:36   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-03 14:38     ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05  7:18     ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05  8:11       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 14:41   ` George Dunlap
2017-04-05 16:22     ` Yu Zhang [this message]
2017-04-05 16:35       ` George Dunlap
2017-04-05 16:32         ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 17:01           ` George Dunlap
2017-04-05 17:18             ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 17:28               ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 18:02                 ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05 18:04                   ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-06  7:48                     ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  8:27                       ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-06  8:44                         ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-06  7:43                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 17:29               ` George Dunlap
2017-04-02 12:24 ` [PATCH v10 6/6] x86/ioreq server: Synchronously reset outstanding p2m_ioreq_server entries when an ioreq server unmaps Yu Zhang
2017-04-03  8:16   ` Paul Durrant
2017-04-03 15:23   ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05  9:11     ` Yu Zhang
2017-04-05  9:41       ` Jan Beulich
2017-04-05 14:46   ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58E519AB.7050004@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).