From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
jbeulich@suse.com, Kai Huang <kaih.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] xen: tools: expose EPC in ACPI table
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:44:02 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58d7f49e-61f1-2a88-3847-3b39d961c84f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718102143.dcfnx2wgpys4r3x3@dhcp-3-128.uk.xensource.com>
On 7/18/2017 10:21 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:36:15PM +1200, Huang, Kai wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/17/2017 10:54 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 08:16:05PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
>>>> On physical machine EPC is exposed in ACPI table via "INT0E0C". Although EPC
>>>> can be discovered by CPUID but Windows driver requires EPC to be exposed in
>>>> ACPI table as well. This patch exposes EPC in ACPI table.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h | 3 +++
>>>
>>> Is there any reason this needs to be done in hvmloader instead of
>>> libacpi? I'm mostly asking this because PVH guests can also get ACPI
>>> tables, so it would be good to be able to expose EPC to them using
>>> ACPI.
>>
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> Thanks for comments. I didn't deliberately choose to do in hvmloader instead
>> of libacpi. It seems libxl only builds ACPI table when guest is HVM, and it
>> doesn't use any device model, and I think I have covered this part (see
>> changes to init_acpi_config). Is there anything that I missed?
>
> dsdt.asl is only used for HVM guests, PVH guests basically get an
> empty dsdt + dsdt_acpi_info + processor objects populated by make_dsdt
> (see Makefile in libacpi), so they end up without the EPC Device
> block.
>
> It would be good if a new empty dsdt is created, that contains the
> Device EPC block, or a ssdt is used, and it's added to both HVM/PVH
> guests.
>
> Alternatively you could also code the EPC Device block in mk_dsdt, but
> that's going to be cumbersome IMHO.
Hi Roger,
I got your point. I think it's definitely better to cover PVH if we can.
Let me see whether it is possible to do.
Thanks,
-Kai
>
> Thanks, Roger.
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-09 8:03 [RFC PATCH 00/15] RFC: SGX virtualization design and draft patches Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:04 ` [PATCH 01/15] xen: x86: expose SGX to HVM domain in CPU featureset Kai Huang
2017-07-12 11:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-17 6:20 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-18 10:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-18 22:41 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 02/15] xen: vmx: detect ENCLS VMEXIT Kai Huang
2017-07-12 11:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-12 18:54 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 4:57 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 03/15] xen: x86: add early stage SGX feature detection Kai Huang
2017-07-19 14:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-21 9:17 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-22 1:06 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 06/15] xen: x86: add SGX basic EPC management Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 07/15] xen: x86: add functions to populate and destroy EPC for domain Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 09/15] xen: vmx: handle SGX related MSRs Kai Huang
2017-07-19 17:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-21 9:42 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-22 1:37 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 10/15] xen: vmx: handle ENCLS VMEXIT Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 11/15] xen: vmx: handle VMEXIT from SGX enclave Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:09 ` [PATCH 12/15] xen: x86: reset EPC when guest got suspended Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:10 ` [PATCH 04/15] xen: mm: add ioremap_cache Kai Huang
2017-07-11 20:14 ` Julien Grall
2017-07-12 1:52 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-12 7:13 ` Julien Grall
2017-07-13 5:01 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-12 6:17 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-13 4:59 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:10 ` [PATCH 08/15] xen: x86: add SGX cpuid handling support Kai Huang
2017-07-12 10:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-13 5:42 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-14 7:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-14 11:08 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-17 6:16 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:12 ` [PATCH 05/15] xen: p2m: new 'p2m_epc' type for EPC mapping Kai Huang
2017-07-12 11:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-12 12:21 ` George Dunlap
2017-07-13 5:56 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-09 8:14 ` [PATCH 13/15] xen: tools: add new 'epc' parameter support Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:15 ` [PATCH 14/15] xen: tools: add SGX to applying CPUID policy Kai Huang
2017-07-09 8:16 ` [PATCH 15/15] xen: tools: expose EPC in ACPI table Kai Huang
2017-07-12 11:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-13 8:23 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-14 11:31 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-17 6:11 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-17 10:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-07-18 8:36 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-18 10:21 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-07-18 22:44 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2017-07-11 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] RFC: SGX virtualization design and draft patches Andrew Cooper
2017-07-17 6:08 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-21 9:04 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-17 9:16 ` Wei Liu
2017-07-18 8:22 ` Huang, Kai
2017-07-28 13:40 ` Wei Liu
2017-07-31 8:37 ` Huang, Kai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58d7f49e-61f1-2a88-3847-3b39d961c84f@linux.intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=kaih.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).