From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:44:28 +0000 Message-ID: <5E76374B-EEBA-4C0B-A157-85E4F57DBEE3@gmail.com> References: <1452160573.21055.147.camel@citrix.com> <1452165737.21055.197.camel@citrix.com> <568E5DF902000078000C4542@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <568E5DF902000078000C4542@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, WeiLiu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , Lars Kurth List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > On 7 Jan 2016, at 11:45, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> On 07.01.16 at 12:22, wrote: >> So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer supported. >> Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always have >> to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue. >> >> We should add rows to http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features right >> under Initial Release giving first the date until which that tree is >> supported with backports and second the date until which security support >> will exist. We might also want to add a third "status" row. e.g. >> "Supported", "Security Support only", "EOL" (we'll deal with extended >> support by a third party when that next arises). >> >> I'm happy to make the edits, however I don't know what dates I would write >> here. Taking it to be 18 months of Support and a further 18 months of >> security support I would get: Ian, that would be great. Can you ping me when done? I still have an open action to come up with an approach to include information in this table in in-tree documentation Lars