From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: lars.kurth@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
jbeulich@suse.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:45:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5adcde1e-bb27-22fe-23d7-ec2f87eb5ad8@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81a489aa-5f31-ac16-9fc6-0501c73e9f55@oracle.com>
On 15/11/16 13:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 01:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We
>>> pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter.
>>>
>>> If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will be built.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>>
>> This doesn't seem to be strictly necessary for 4.8 though.
> Right.
>
> In fact, I'd argue that even the first patch could wait until after 4.8
> is out given that we are quite late in RC cycle now and it is not fixing
> any bugs.
Patch 1 should definitely be taken into 4.8, so we don't end up with one
release of Xen with a dual-licensed libacpi.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-15 4:52 [PATCH 0/2] libacpi updates Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-15 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] tools/libacpi: Re-licence remaining GPL code to LGPLv2.1 Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-15 6:14 ` Wei Liu
2016-11-15 8:10 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-15 15:14 ` Wei Liu
2016-11-15 4:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-15 6:17 ` Wei Liu
2016-11-15 13:35 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-15 13:45 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-11-15 14:14 ` Lars Kurth
2016-11-15 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-15 4:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] libacpi updates Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5adcde1e-bb27-22fe-23d7-ec2f87eb5ad8@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).