xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schinzel <schinzel@ip-projects.de>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: RE: Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 14:26:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64f352a7a8a14ec19da5d07374b48eb6@ip-projects.de> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1425 bytes --]

We have searched in the last days more and more for the cause of this performance issue.

In cooperation with the datacenter, we change some hardware to check, if the problem already proceeds. We put the RAID Controller included all RAID Arrays to another Supermicro Mainboard: X10SLM-F with only one CPU. The result was, we got 400 MB/s read Speed. So it seems there is an issue with the Servers Mainboard / CPU and the Xen Hypervisor but, we also change the Mainboard to an Supermicro X9DR3-F with the actual BIOS Version 3.2a - these also do not solved the problem with the performance.

What we also have done:

-          Upgraded Hypervisor from default Debian 8 - 4.4.1 to 4.8.

-          Tested some kernel boot configurations

With an non hypervisor Kernel, the system also uses the read Cache of the controller and after some read operations at the same file, it gets 1.2 G/s back from the Cache. At Xen Hypervisor Kernel, it seems the system do not use any caching operations. I also tested a bit with hdparm:

root@v7:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/sdb

/dev/sdb:
Timing cached reads:   14060 MB in  1.99 seconds = 7076.16 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 304 MB in  3.01 seconds = 100.85 MB/sec

This Performance is horrable. It is a RAID 10 with read/write cache and SSD Caching functions.

Does somebody know how Xen proceeds with such Caching Systems?


Yours sincerely

Michael Schinzel



[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7150 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

             reply	other threads:[~2016-12-27 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-27 14:26 Michael Schinzel [this message]
2016-12-30 16:34 ` Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated Dario Faggioli
2016-12-30 16:53   ` Michael Schinzel
2016-12-31  9:07   ` Michael Schinzel
2017-01-02  7:15   ` Michael Schinzel
2017-01-12 17:03     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-13 13:32       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-26 11:48 Michael Schinzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64f352a7a8a14ec19da5d07374b48eb6@ip-projects.de \
    --to=schinzel@ip-projects.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).