xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schinzel <schinzel@ip-projects.de>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.paumonne@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 09:07:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <686bc4d118c3496e83f3c19c64ee53ef@ip-projects.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483115698.32021.102.camel@citrix.com>

Ok, it seems there is no way to Upgrade the Intel ME Version. In the lates BIOS Version of Supermicro it is 

-------[ ME Analyzer v1.7.0_35 RC ]-------
            Database r75_3

File:     X9DRi5.709

Firmware: Intel SPS
Version:  02.01.07.231.1
Release:  Production
Type:     Region
Mode:     Dual OPR
Date:     10/05/2013
Size:     0x2F0000

Also i dont know, if this is realy the issue. Because with a non Hypervisor Kernel it work all fine. 


Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Michael Schinzel
- Geschäftsführer -


IP-Projects GmbH & Co. KG
Am Vogelherd 14
D - 97295 Waldbrunn 
Telefon: 09306 - 76499-0
FAX: 09306 - 76499-15
E-Mail: info@ip-projects.de
Geschäftsführer: Michael Schinzel
Registergericht Würzburg: HRA 6798
Komplementär: IP-Projects Verwaltungs GmbH



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@citrix.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Dezember 2016 17:35
An: Michael Schinzel <schinzel@ip-projects.de>; Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.paumonne@citrix.com>; Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Betreff: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated

[Cc-ing someone which have done disk benchmark in somewhat recent time]

On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 14:26 +0000, Michael Schinzel wrote:
> We have searched in the last days more and more for the cause of this 
> performance issue.
>  
> In cooperation with the datacenter, we change some hardware to check, 
> if the problem already proceeds. We put the RAID Controller included 
> all RAID Arrays to another Supermicro Mainboard: X10SLM-F with only 
> one CPU. The result was, we got 400 MB/s read Speed. So it seems there 
> is an issue with the Servers Mainboard / CPU and the Xen Hypervisor 
> but, we also change the Mainboard to an Supermicro X9DR3-F with the 
> actual BIOS Version 3.2a – these also do not solved the problem with 
> the performance.
>  
> What we also have done:
> -          Upgraded Hypervisor from default Debian 8 – 4.4.1 to 4.8.
> -          Tested some kernel boot configurations\
>
I think it would be useful to know more about your configuration, e.g., are these tests being done in Dom0? How many vCPUs and memory does Dom0 have?

> With an non hypervisor Kernel, the system also uses the read Cache of 
> the controller and after some read operations at the same file, it 
> gets 1.2 G/s back from the Cache. At Xen Hypervisor Kernel, it seems 
> the system do not use any caching operations. I also tested a bit with 
> hdparm:
>  
> root@v7:~# hdparm -Tt /dev/sdb
>  
> /dev/sdb:
> Timing cached reads:   14060 MB in  1.99 seconds = 7076.16 MB/sec 
> Timing buffered disk reads: 304 MB in  3.01 seconds = 100.85 MB/sec
>  
> This Performance is horrable. It is a RAID 10 with read/write cache 
> and SSD Caching functions.
>  
> Does somebody know how Xen proceeds with such Caching Systems?
>  
>  
> Yours sincerely
>  
> Michael Schinzel
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-31  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-27 14:26 Read Performance issue when Xen Hypervisor is activated Michael Schinzel
2016-12-30 16:34 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-30 16:53   ` Michael Schinzel
2016-12-31  9:07   ` Michael Schinzel [this message]
2017-01-02  7:15   ` Michael Schinzel
2017-01-12 17:03     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-13 13:32       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-26 11:48 Michael Schinzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=686bc4d118c3496e83f3c19c64ee53ef@ip-projects.de \
    --to=schinzel@ip-projects.de \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.paumonne@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).