From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Mammedov Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] move qemu_irq typedef out of cpu-common.h Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:28:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <703606518.14100692.1346077718872.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: Peter Maydell Cc: jan kiszka , mjt@tls.msk.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, kraxel@redhat.com, Eduardo Habkost , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, i mitsyanko , mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, avi@redhat.com, anthony perard , lersek@redhat.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefano stabellini , sw@weilnetz.de, lcapitulino@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Maydell" ... > > I'm not objecting to this patch if it helps us move forwards, > but adding the #include to sysemu.h is effectively just adding > the definition to another grabbag header (183 files include > sysemu.h). It would be nicer long-term to separate out the > one thing in this header that cares about qemu_irq (the extern > declaration of qemu_system_powerdown). ^^^^ Is there a preference/suggestion in which header it should be declared? ...