From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Magenheimer Subject: RE: Q about System-wide Memory Management Strategies Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <72952ad0-a63e-4776-853a-433399fa66f3@default> References: <4C573AF0.2050400@invisiblethingslab.com> <2f3f8999-3013-4ffb-913f-3aac96c62fd8@default> <4C58992D.7000403@invisiblethingslab.com 4C6D17F0.1010702@invisiblethingslab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C6D17F0.1010702@invisiblethingslab.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Joanna Rutkowska Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qubes-devel@googlegroups.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > From: Joanna Rutkowska [mailto:joanna@invisiblethingslab.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:39 AM > To: Joanna Rutkowska > Cc: Dan Magenheimer; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; qubes- > devel@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Q about System-wide Memory Management Strategies >=20 > On 08/04/10 00:33, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > > > > No problem. Hopefully some of the above questions would fall into the > > "clarification" category :) And maybe others will answer the others > :) >=20 > Just been wondering -- how does XenClient deal with this? Is the memory > assigned statically to the guests? I don't know anything about XenClient but I suspect static assignment is the right answer.