xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_schedule_in/out()
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:42:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <756fd72b-a0cb-d8d3-c01b-c2c9071843be@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718103429.25020-8-sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>

On 07/18/2017 11:34 AM, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> np2m maintenance is required for a nested vcpu during scheduling:
> 
>     1. On schedule-out: clear pCPU's bit in p2m->dirty_cpumask
>                         to prevent useless IPIs.
> 
>     2. On schedule-in: check if np2m is up to date and wasn't flushed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>
> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c     | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> index 3d65899b05..4b83d4a4f1 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> @@ -1880,6 +1880,58 @@ p2m_get_p2m(struct vcpu *v)
>      return p2m_get_nestedp2m(v);
>  }
>  
> +static void np2m_schedule(bool sched_out)
> +{
> +    struct nestedvcpu *nv = &vcpu_nestedhvm(current);
> +    struct p2m_domain *p2m;
> +    bool sched_in = !sched_out;
> +
> +    if ( !nestedhvm_enabled(current->domain) ||
> +         !nestedhvm_vcpu_in_guestmode(current) ||
> +         !nestedhvm_paging_mode_hap(current) )
> +        return;
> +
> +    p2m = nv->nv_p2m;
> +    if ( p2m )
> +    {
> +        bool np2m_valid;
> +
> +        p2m_lock(p2m);
> +        np2m_valid = p2m->np2m_base == nhvm_vcpu_p2m_base(current) &&
> +                     nv->np2m_generation == p2m->np2m_generation;
> +        if ( sched_out && np2m_valid )
> +        {
> +            /*
> +             * The np2m is up to date but this vCPU will no longer use it,
> +             * which means there are no reasons to send a flush IPI.
> +             */
> +            cpumask_clear_cpu(current->processor, p2m->dirty_cpumask);
> +        }
> +        else if ( sched_in )
> +        {
> +            if ( !np2m_valid )
> +            {
> +                /* This vCPU's np2m was flushed while it was not runnable */
> +                hvm_asid_flush_core();
> +                vcpu_nestedhvm(current).nv_p2m = NULL;
> +            }
> +            else
> +                cpumask_set_cpu(current->processor, p2m->dirty_cpumask);
> +        }
> +        p2m_unlock(p2m);
> +    }
> +}

This level of sharing seems a tad excessive to me; but if we're going to
do it, I think it would be more clear if the callers called a function
called np2m_schedule() with `dir`, then define things something like this:

#define NP2M_SCHEDLE_IN  0
#define NP2M_SCHEDLE_OUT 1

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-28 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 10:34 [PATCH RFC 00/12] Nested p2m: allow sharing between vCPUs Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] x86/np2m: refactor p2m_get_nestedp2m() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_flush_eptp() Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-01  7:55   ` Egger, Christoph
2017-08-03 14:18     ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-03 14:40       ` Jan Beulich
2017-08-28 16:08   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] x86/vvmx: use np2m_flush_eptp() for INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] x86/np2m: remove np2m_base from p2m_get_nestedp2m() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_generation Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:18   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] x86/vvmx: add stale_eptp flag Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:31   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_schedule_in/out() Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:42   ` George Dunlap [this message]
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] x86/np2m: add p2m_get_nestedp2m_locked() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] x86/np2m: improve nestedhvm_hap_nested_page_fault() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] x86/np2m: implement sharing of np2m between vCPUs Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:59   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] x86/np2m: add break to np2m_flush_eptp() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] x86/vvmx: remove EPTP write from ept_handle_violation() Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 17:03 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] Nested p2m: allow sharing between vCPUs George Dunlap
2017-08-29 13:39   ` Sergey Dyasli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=756fd72b-a0cb-d8d3-c01b-c2c9071843be@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).