xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@citrix.com>,
	"zhiyuan.lv@intel.com" <zhiyuan.lv@intel.com>,
	"jbeulich@suse.com" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_ranges.
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:54:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a1e981ca15b491e878fb32287f5ea7a@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119115349.GV1691@citrix.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@citrix.com]
> Sent: 19 January 2016 11:54
> To: Yu Zhang
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Kevin Tian; Keir (Xen.org); Stefano Stabellini;
> Andrew Cooper; Paul Durrant; zhiyuan.lv@intel.com; jbeulich@suse.com;
> Wei Liu
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] tools: introduce parameter
> max_ranges.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 05:27:58PM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> > A new parameter - max_ranges is added to set the upper limit of ranges
> > to be tracked inside one ioreq server rangeset.
> >
> > Ioreq server uses a group of rangesets to track the I/O or memory
> > resources to be emulated. The default value of this limit is set to
> > 256. Yet there are circumstances under which the limit should exceed
> > the default one. E.g. in XenGT, when tracking the per-process graphic
> > translation tables on intel broadwell platforms, the number of page
> > tables concerned will be several thousand(normally in this case, 8192
> > could be a big enough value). Users who set his item explicitly are
> > supposed to know the specific scenarios that necessitate this
> > configuration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5           | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c         |  3 +++
> >  tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl     |  1 +
> >  tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c        |  4 ++++
> >  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c          |  7 ++++++-
> >  xen/include/public/hvm/params.h |  5 ++++-
> >  6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5 b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5
> > index 8899f75..562563d 100644
> > --- a/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5
> > +++ b/docs/man/xl.cfg.pod.5
> > @@ -962,6 +962,23 @@ FIFO-based event channel ABI support up to
> 131,071 event channels.
> >  Other guests are limited to 4095 (64-bit x86 and ARM) or 1023 (32-bit
> >  x86).
> >
> > +=item B<max_ranges=N>
> > +
> 
> This name is too generic. I don't have better suggestion though.
> 

I think the increased limit for XenGT need only be applied to wp mem ranges so perhaps the parameter name could be 'max_wp_memory_ranges'?

  Paul

> > +Limit the maximum ranges that can be tracked inside one ioreq server
> > +rangeset.
> > +
> > +Ioreq server uses a group of rangesets to track the I/O or memory
> > +resources to be emulated. By default, this item is not set. Not
> > +configuring this item, or setting its value to 0 will result in the
> > +upper limit set to its default value - 256. Yet there are circumstances
> 
> No need to say 256 because this might change in the future in
> hypervisor.
> 
> > +under which the upper limit inside one rangeset should exceed the
> > +default one. E.g. in XenGT, when tracking the per-process graphic
> > +translation tables on intel broadwell platforms, the number of page
> > +tables concerned will be several thousand(normally in this case, 8192
> > +could be a big enough value). Users who set his item explicitly are
> > +supposed to know the specific scenarios that necessitate this
> > +configuration.
> > +
> >  =back
> >
> >  =head2 Paravirtualised (PV) Guest Specific Options
> > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> > index 47971a9..607b0c4 100644
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> > @@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ static void hvm_set_conf_params(xc_interface
> *handle, uint32_t domid,
> >                      libxl_defbool_val(info->u.hvm.nested_hvm));
> >      xc_hvm_param_set(handle, domid, HVM_PARAM_ALTP2M,
> >                      libxl_defbool_val(info->u.hvm.altp2m));
> > +    if (info->u.hvm.max_ranges > 0)
> > +        xc_hvm_param_set(handle, domid, HVM_PARAM_MAX_RANGES,
> > +                        info->u.hvm.max_ranges);
> >  }
> >
> >  int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid,
> > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
> > index 9ad7eba..c936265 100644
> > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl
> > @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ libxl_domain_build_info =
> Struct("domain_build_info",[
> >                                         ("serial_list",      libxl_string_list),
> >                                         ("rdm", libxl_rdm_reserve),
> >                                         ("rdm_mem_boundary_memkb", MemKB),
> > +                                       ("max_ranges", uint32),
> 
> This also needs a better name.
> 
> Another thing is that you need to define LIBXL_HAVE_XXX in libxl.h to
> indicate we introduce a new field.
> 
> Wei.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-19 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-19  9:27 [PATCH v10 0/3] Refactor ioreq server for better performance Yu Zhang
2016-01-19  9:27 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] Refactor rangeset structure " Yu Zhang
2016-01-19  9:27 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] Differentiate IO/mem resources tracked by ioreq server Yu Zhang
2016-01-19  9:47   ` Paul Durrant
2016-01-19  9:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_ranges Yu Zhang
2016-01-19 11:53   ` Wei Liu
2016-01-19 13:54     ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2016-01-19 14:37       ` Wei Liu
2016-01-19 14:47         ` Paul Durrant
2016-01-19 15:04           ` Wei Liu
2016-01-19 15:18             ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20  3:14               ` Tian, Kevin
2016-01-20  3:33                 ` Yu, Zhang
2016-01-20  3:58                   ` Tian, Kevin
2016-01-20  5:02                     ` Yu, Zhang
2016-01-20 10:17                       ` Wei Liu
2016-01-20 10:16                     ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-20 10:18                       ` Paul Durrant
2016-01-20 11:13                         ` Yu, Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a1e981ca15b491e878fb32287f5ea7a@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
    --to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhiyuan.lv@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).