xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/17] x86emul: support most memory accessing MMX/SSE{, 2, 3} insns
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:17:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e83a504-c35f-bada-46fb-be229c9735da@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58B57FFD020000780013E29C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 28/02/17 12:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> e 0x0f-escape
> space with memory operands. Not covered here are irregular moves,
> converts, and {,U}COMIS{S,D} (modifying EFLAGS).

Your email has text corruption in this paragraph, but the patch itself
looks ok.

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> @@ -2602,13 +2698,53 @@ x86_decode(
>          ea.mem.off = truncate_ea(ea.mem.off);
>      }
>  
> -    /*
> -     * When prefix 66 has a meaning different from operand-size override,
> -     * operand size defaults to 4 and can't be overridden to 2.
> -     */
> -    if ( op_bytes == 2 &&
> -         (ctxt->opcode & X86EMUL_OPC_PFX_MASK) == X86EMUL_OPC_66(0, 0) )
> -        op_bytes = 4;

Can we have a comment here along the lines of:

"Simple op_bytes calculations.  More complicated cases use 0 and are
further decoded during execute." ?

> +    switch ( state->simd_size )
> +    {
> +    case simd_none:
> +        /*
> +         * When prefix 66 has a meaning different from operand-size override,
> +         * operand size defaults to 4 and can't be overridden to 2.
> +         */
> +        if ( op_bytes == 2 &&
> +             (ctxt->opcode & X86EMUL_OPC_PFX_MASK) == X86EMUL_OPC_66(0, 0) )
> +            op_bytes = 4;
> +        break;
> +
> +    case simd_packed_int:
> +        switch ( vex.pfx )
> +        {
> +        case vex_none: op_bytes = 8;           break;
> +        case vex_66:   op_bytes = 16 << vex.l; break;
> +        default:       op_bytes = 0;           break;
> +        }
> +        break;
> +
> +    case simd_single_fp:
> +        if ( vex.pfx & VEX_PREFIX_DOUBLE_MASK )
> +        {
> +            op_bytes = 0;
> +            break;
> +    case simd_packed_fp:
> +            if ( vex.pfx & VEX_PREFIX_SCALAR_MASK )
> +            {
> +                op_bytes = 0;
> +                break;
> +            }
> +        }
> +        /* fall through */
> +    case simd_any_fp:
> +        switch ( vex.pfx )
> +        {
> +        default:     op_bytes = 16 << vex.l; break;
> +        case vex_f3: op_bytes = 4;           break;
> +        case vex_f2: op_bytes = 8;           break;
> +        }
> +        break;
> +
> +    default:
> +        op_bytes = 0;
> +        break;
> +    }
>  
>   done:
>      return rc;
> @@ -5413,6 +5671,81 @@ x86_emulate(
>          break;
>      }
>  
> +    CASE_SIMD_PACKED_INT(0x0f, 0x70):    /* pshuf{w,d} $imm8,{,x}mm/mem,{,x}mm */
> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_VEX_66(0x0f, 0x70): /* vpshufd $imm8,{x,y}mm/mem,{x,y}mm */
> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_F3(0x0f, 0x70):     /* pshufhw $imm8,xmm/m128,xmm */
> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_VEX_F3(0x0f, 0x70): /* vpshufhw $imm8,{x,y}mm/mem,{x,y}mm */
> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_F2(0x0f, 0x70):     /* pshuflw $imm8,xmm/m128,xmm */
> +    case X86EMUL_OPC_VEX_F2(0x0f, 0x70): /* vpshuflw $imm8,{x,y}mm/mem,{x,y}mm */
> +        d = (d & ~SrcMask) | SrcMem | TwoOp;
> +        op_bytes = vex.pfx ? 16 << vex.l : 8;
> +    simd_0f_int_imm8:
> +        if ( vex.opcx != vex_none )
> +        {
> +            if ( vex.l )
> +                host_and_vcpu_must_have(avx2);
> +            else
> +            {
> +    simd_0f_imm8_avx:
> +                host_and_vcpu_must_have(avx);
> +            }
> +            get_fpu(X86EMUL_FPU_ymm, &fic);
> +        }
> +        else if ( vex.pfx )
> +        {
> +    simd_0f_imm8_sse2:
> +            vcpu_must_have(sse2);
> +            get_fpu(X86EMUL_FPU_xmm, &fic);
> +        }
> +        else
> +        {
> +            host_and_vcpu_must_have(mmx);
> +            vcpu_must_have(sse);
> +            get_fpu(X86EMUL_FPU_mmx, &fic);
> +        }
> +    simd_0f_imm8:
> +    {
> +        uint8_t *buf = get_stub(stub);
> +
> +        buf[0] = 0x3e;
> +        buf[1] = 0x3e;
> +        buf[2] = 0x0f;
> +        buf[3] = b;
> +        buf[4] = modrm;
> +        if ( ea.type == OP_MEM )
> +        {
> +            /* Convert memory operand to (%rAX). */
> +            rex_prefix &= ~REX_B;
> +            vex.b = 1;
> +            buf[4] &= 0x38;
> +        }
> +        buf[5] = imm1;
> +        fic.insn_bytes = 6;

What is the expectation with setting up the ret in the stub or not? 
This seems rather inconsistent at the moment.

> @@ -6159,6 +6551,76 @@ x86_emulate(
>          goto cannot_emulate;
>      }
>  
> +    if ( state->simd_size )
> +    {
> +#ifdef __XEN__
> +        uint8_t *buf = stub.ptr;
> +#else
> +        uint8_t *buf = get_stub(stub);
> +#endif

Is this stale?  Everywhere else is just get_stub() without any ifdefary.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-28 12:42 [PATCH v4 00/17] x86emul: MMX/SSEn support Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] x86emul: support most memory accessing MMX/SSE{, 2, 3} insns Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 13:17   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-03-01 13:50     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 18:08       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] x86emul: support MMX/SSE{,2,3} moves Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 13:59   ` [PATCH v4 02/17] x86emul: support MMX/SSE{, 2, 3} moves Andrew Cooper
2017-03-01 14:19     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 19:56       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-02  8:07         ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] x86emul: support MMX/SSE/SSE2 converts Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 14:09   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86emul: support {,V}{,U}COMIS{S,D} Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 14:16   ` [PATCH v4 04/17] x86emul: support {, V}{, U}COMIS{S, D} Andrew Cooper
2017-03-01 14:26     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 14:31       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] x86emul: support MMX/SSE{, 2, 4a} insns with only register operands Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 14:36   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-01 14:43     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 20:01       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] x86emul: support {,V}{LD,ST}MXCSR Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 14:57   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] x86emul: support {,V}MOVNTDQA Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 14:58   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] x86emul: test coverage for SSE/SSE2 insns Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:54 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] x86emul: honor MMXEXT feature flag Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:54 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] x86emul: add tables for 0f38 and 0f3a extension space Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 15:49   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-01 16:11     ` Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 20:35       ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-02  8:15         ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:55 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] x86emul: support SSSE3 insns Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 16:06   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] x86emul: support SSE4.1 insns Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 16:58   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-02  8:26     ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] x86emul: support SSE4.2 insns Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 17:21   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] x86emul: test coverage for SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4* insns Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 17:22   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-28 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] x86emul: support PCLMULQDQ Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 17:44   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-03-02  8:30     ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] x86emul: support AESNI insns Jan Beulich
2017-02-28 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] x86emul: support SHA insns Jan Beulich
2017-03-01 17:51   ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e83a504-c35f-bada-46fb-be229c9735da@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).