xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/svm: Add checks for nested HW features
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:15:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8eb9d4df-e911-c213-4c32-dd20a54d0728@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171221152619.38079-3-brian.woods@amd.com>

On 21/12/17 15:26, Brian Woods wrote:
> Add a nestedhvm_enable() check to the existing checks for setting the
> virtual GIF and virtual VMLOAD/VMSAVE features.  If it isn't a nestedhvm
> guest, do not enable the features in the VMCB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>

Unfortunately, nestedhvm_enabled() is guaranteed to be false at the
point that construct_vmcb() is called (due the order in which
information appears while constructing the VM), which means we will
never enable these optimisations.

Combined with the observation of EFER in the pipeline, the logic to
enable/disable these optimisations needs to be in
svm_update_guest_efer(), and need to trigger when EFER.SVME changes.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-22 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-21 15:26 [PATCH 0/2] Various SVM Patches Brian Woods
2017-12-21 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/svm: Add SVME checking for SVM intercepts Brian Woods
2017-12-22  4:52   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-12-22 15:07     ` Brian Woods
2017-12-21 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/svm: Add checks for nested HW features Brian Woods
2017-12-22  4:55   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-12-22 15:15   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2018-01-05 15:27     ` Brian Woods

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8eb9d4df-e911-c213-4c32-dd20a54d0728@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=brian.woods@amd.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).