xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bulpin <James.Bulpin@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Matthew Allen <matthew.allen@citrix.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"committers@xenproject.org" <committers@xenproject.org>,
	Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Possible improvement to Xen Security Response Process
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:58:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90aafb6165594fa387b813e3f8a8860e@AMSPEX02CL01.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <584FC251020000780012875F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 08:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.12.16 at 18:11, <matthew.allen@citrix.com> wrote:
>> I'll join in the bunfight with a stronger proposal (noting in passing 
>> that according to https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/ we are now expecting 5 
>> consecutive weeks of XSA announcements):
>> 1) Where practical, XSA public disclosures will be batched and 
>> announced once per month.
>> 2) The calendar of disclosure dates will be published well in advance 
>> and will avoid Fridays, weekends, or dates on or immediately before 
>> widely respected public holidays.
>> 3) Issues will normally have at least 14 days pre-disclosure; this 
>> means that an issue discovered immediately prior to a scheduled 
>> publication date will normally not be disclosed until the next publication date.
>
>Hmm - this means 6 weeks of latency in the worst case. I don't think that's reasonable.

What if instead we adopted a model similar to Microsoft's "patch Tuesday"[1]
where there is always one scheduled release/disclosure date per month and a
second scheduled date two weeks later that is used if needed. As discussed
earlier in this thread we could issue guidance/recommendations to the
discovers on choice of disclosure date - this could be along the lines of
"the second Tuesday in a month that is at least 14 days after the initial
pre-disclosure; in cases where this creates a significant delay, such as
more than 4 weeks, and the issue is considered to be of significant urgency
due to its severity, then the fourth Tuesday in the month should be
considered so long as this allows for a 14 day pre-disclosure period" (or
something like that).

Thoughts?

Cheers,
James

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_Tuesday
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-04 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-05 14:17 Possible improvement to Xen Security Response Process Matthew Allen
2016-12-05 15:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-05 19:24   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 14:54     ` Matthew Allen
2016-12-07 16:23       ` Ian Jackson
2016-12-12 17:11         ` Matthew Allen
2016-12-13  1:54           ` Anthony Liguori
2016-12-13  8:41           ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 11:58             ` James Bulpin [this message]
2017-01-04 13:01               ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-04 13:12                 ` James Bulpin
2017-01-20 19:21               ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 11:30                 ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-17 11:18                   ` Lars Kurth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90aafb6165594fa387b813e3f8a8860e@AMSPEX02CL01.citrite.net \
    --to=james.bulpin@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=committers@xenproject.org \
    --cc=ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
    --cc=matthew.allen@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).