From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dot Yet Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Jeremy's git tags Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:31:42 -0500 Message-ID: <93bc4af41003121831i43555cfbx764d8872645b29de@mail.gmail.com> References: <93bc4af41003112132g1566595ewc6371e7ac3816f69@mail.gmail.com> <27874119.post@talk.nabble.com> <93bc4af41003120431h2c839b3ep4d55b49567bfcd9e@mail.gmail.com> <93bc4af41003121208s9ac9569j86bd2b85df346b82@mail.gmail.com> <4B9AB60C.8020109@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B9AB60C.8020109@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Yeah its for dom0. Too bad, i cant try them together. I find no shame in admitting that I am not good at code hacking :) In reality as a learning experience I wanted to use lustre based storage between two nodes providing HA to some xen domU. At some point I thought about using Sun's QFS, but since this is all on Lenny, its not that easy, plus having a QFS client also requires custom kernel. Thanks everyone. Regards, dot.yet On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrot= e: > On 03/12/2010 12:08 PM, Dot Yet wrote: >> >> OK. compilation of Lustre 1.8.2 on Jeremy's 2.6.32.9 and stock >> 2.6.32.9, both failed. >> >> Can someone tell me how I can get 2.6.30.x from Jeremy's git repository? >> > > I think it will be easiest to get version of Lustre forward-ported rather > than trying to backport all the Xen stuff to an older kernel. > > That's assuming that what you want is a Xen-enabled Linux kernel with dom= 0 > capability running Lustre. =A0If you just want domU support, then a stock > kernel.org 2.6.30.x will suit your purposes. > > =A0 =A0J >