xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Martin Cerveny <M.Cerveny@computer.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server (Xen4.6.1)
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:02:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95a929eb370a4761b2a3ef504e79f0cb@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abd0f2cfba4e4f0fa3ed50741bb2984b@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of
> Paul Durrant
> Sent: 09 May 2016 14:00
> To: Paolo Bonzini; Martin Cerveny
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; George Dunlap
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server
> (Xen4.6.1)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@redhat.com]
> > Sent: 09 May 2016 13:56
> > To: Paul Durrant; Martin Cerveny
> > Cc: George Dunlap; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server
> > (Xen4.6.1)
> >
> >
> >
> > On 28/04/2016 13:25, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > >> Maybe you are lucky, qemu is registered before your own demu
> > >> emulator.
> > >
> > > I guess I was lucky.
> >
> > Yeah, QEMU has been doing that since 2013 (commit 3bb28b7, "memory:
> > Provide separate handling of unassigned io ports accesses", 2013-09-05).
> >
> > >> I used for testing your "demu" 2 years ago, now extending Citrix
> > >> "vgpu", all was fine up to xen 4.5.2 (with qemu 2.0.2) but
> > >> problem begin when I switched to 4.6.1 (with qemu 2.2.1), but it
> > >> maybe lucky timing in registration.
> > >
> > > I think Xen should really be spotting range overlaps like this, but
> > > the QEMU<->Xen interface will clearly need to be fixed to avoid the
> > > over-claiming of I/O ports like this.
> >
> > If the handling of unassigned I/O ports is sane in Xen (in QEMU they
> > return all ones and discard writes),
> 
> Yes, it does exactly that.
> 
> > it would be okay to make the
> > background 0-65535 range conditional on !xen_enabled().  See
> > memory_map_init() in QEMU's exec.c file.
> >
> 
> Cool. Thanks for the tip. Will have a look at that now.
> 

Looks like creation of the background range is required. (Well, when I simply #if 0-ed out creating it QEMU crashed on invocation). So, I guess I need to be able to spot, from the memory listener callback in Xen, when a background range is being added so it can be ignored. Same actually goes for memory as well as I/O, since Xen will handle access to unimplemented MMIO ranges in a similar fashion.

  Paul 

> Cheers,
> 
>   Paul
> 
> > Paolo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-09 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-27 19:38 Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server (Xen4.6.1) Martin Cerveny
2016-04-28  8:50 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-28  9:46   ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-28 11:16     ` Martin Cerveny
2016-04-28 11:25       ` Paul Durrant
2016-05-09 12:55         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-09 12:59           ` Paul Durrant
2016-05-09 16:02             ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2016-05-09 16:14               ` Paul Durrant
2016-05-09 16:18                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-09 16:19                   ` Paul Durrant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95a929eb370a4761b2a3ef504e79f0cb@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
    --to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=M.Cerveny@computer.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).