* [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/dmar: zap DMAR signature for dom0 once in TBOOT case
@ 2018-08-21 9:11 Zhenzhong Duan
2018-08-21 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhenzhong Duan @ 2018-08-21 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen-Devel
Cc: kevin.tian, andrew.cooper3, srinivas.eeda, JBeulich, shane.wang,
boris.ostrovsky, gang.wei
When TBOOT enabled, acpi_parse_dmar() called acpi_dmar_zap() to zap
DMAR table, then tboot_parse_dmar_table() called acpi_dmar_zap() to
zap it again. This is unnecessory, remove the second call.
Some stale comments not right for current code are also removed.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
---
v3: fixup patch and description.
xen/arch/x86/tboot.c | 6 ------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c
index d5a5292..1006f95 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c
@@ -461,8 +461,6 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler)
if ( txt_heap_base == 0 )
return 1;
- /* map TXT heap into Xen addr space */
-
/* walk heap to SinitMleData */
pa = txt_heap_base;
/* skip BiosData */
@@ -490,10 +488,6 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler)
rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table);
xfree(dmar_table);
- /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */
- /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */
- acpi_dmar_zap();
-
return rc;
}
--
1.7.3
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/dmar: zap DMAR signature for dom0 once in TBOOT case
2018-08-21 9:11 [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/dmar: zap DMAR signature for dom0 once in TBOOT case Zhenzhong Duan
@ 2018-08-21 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
2018-08-22 2:58 ` Tian, Kevin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2018-08-21 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhenzhong Duan
Cc: Kevin Tian, Andrew Cooper, Xen-Devel, Shane Wang, Boris Ostrovsky,
Srinivas REDDY Eeda, Gang Wei
>>> On 21.08.18 at 11:11, <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> wrote:
> @@ -490,10 +488,6 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler)
> rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table);
> xfree(dmar_table);
>
> - /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */
> - /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */
> - acpi_dmar_zap();
Interesting - now you remove the other one. I think this is actually correct,
but understanding why could _again_ have been a lot easier with a better
description. Afaict commit 6c298ecc1f ("vtd: Reinstate ACPI DMAR on
system shutdown or S3/S4/S5") did everything for this call to be
unnecessary, except for invoking the function from acpi_parse_dmar(),
which 123c779379 ("VTd/dmar: Tweak how the DMAR table is clobbered")
added several years later.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/dmar: zap DMAR signature for dom0 once in TBOOT case
2018-08-21 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2018-08-22 2:58 ` Tian, Kevin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2018-08-22 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, Zhenzhong Duan
Cc: Andrew Cooper, Srinivas REDDY Eeda, Wang, Shane, Boris Ostrovsky,
Xen-Devel, Wei, Gang
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:32 PM
>
> >>> On 21.08.18 at 11:11, <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> wrote:
> > @@ -490,10 +488,6 @@ int __init
> tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler)
> > rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table);
> > xfree(dmar_table);
> >
> > - /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */
> > - /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */
> > - acpi_dmar_zap();
>
> Interesting - now you remove the other one. I think this is actually correct,
> but understanding why could _again_ have been a lot easier with a better
> description. Afaict commit 6c298ecc1f ("vtd: Reinstate ACPI DMAR on
> system shutdown or S3/S4/S5") did everything for this call to be
> unnecessary, except for invoking the function from acpi_parse_dmar(),
> which 123c779379 ("VTd/dmar: Tweak how the DMAR table is clobbered")
> added several years later.
>
yes, a better description is expected here.
Thanks
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-22 2:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-21 9:11 [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/dmar: zap DMAR signature for dom0 once in TBOOT case Zhenzhong Duan
2018-08-21 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
2018-08-22 2:58 ` Tian, Kevin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).