From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: regression from c/s 22071:c5aed2e049bc (ept: Put locks around ept_get_entry) ? Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:48:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4D073B3A0200007800027BDF@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich , Christoph Egger Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > I haven't had a chance to test it > -- can you give it a spin? I should say, the XenServer version of the patch (against 3.4) has been thoroughly tested, but doesn't apply cleanly to -unstable. So the concept is tested, it's just this particular patch that's untested. -George