From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Ole=B6?= Subject: Re: 2.6.32.16: hvm domU boot - oops at add_pin_to_irq_node_nopanic Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201007082125.48868.lukaszoles@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org W dniu 9 lipca 2010 12:46 u=BFytkownik Stefano Stabellini napisa=B3: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, =A3ukasz Ole=B6 wrote: >> W dniu 9 lipca 2010 11:42 u=BFytkownik =A3ukasz Ole=B6 napisa=B3: >> > 2010/7/8 =A3ukasz Ole=B6 : >> >> On Thursday 08 July 2010 17:39:49 Bruce Edge wrote: >> >>> This is the same problem as this post: >> >>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-06/msg01114.= html >> >>> >> >>> Stefano suggested I retry after Jeremy's pull. >> >>> >> >>> Sync'd with 2.6.32.16 last night and it looks like the identical pro= blem. >> >>> >> >>> I can boot Ubuntu 10.04 with it's own native kernel, but not with a = pv-ops >> >>> kernel. >> >> >> >> I have identical problem and tried with and without CONFIG_XEN_PLATFO= RM_PCI >> >> option. >> >> >> >> I'll test xen/next-2.6.32 and see if it helps. >> >> >> > >> > I tried xen/next-2.6.32 and there is no call trace but now it just han= gs. >> > I'm running this kernel as HVM domU, but it has enabled options for >> > dom0. Should this work? >> > >> > Attached kernel config file and logs from xen/stable-2.6.32 xen/next-2= .6.32 >> > >> >> Sending also output from xm log >> >> This line: "(XEN) hvm.c:3115:d15 Bad HVM op 9." =A0appears when starting >> domU with kernel from =A0xen/next-2.6.32 > > That line means that you are running on a Xen version that doesn't have > HVMOP_pagetable_dying, like xen 4.0 testing for example. It shouldn't > caouse any trouble per se. > If you are running on xen 4.0, could you please apply to the hypervisor > the patch I attached to this email and try one more time? > Could you rebase this patch for the latest xen-4.0-testing? I have problems with running xen-4.0 on my computer. --=20 =A3ukasz Ole=B6