From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dulloor Subject: Re: [vNUMA v2][PATCH 1/8] Config options Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:47:29 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1BEA8649F0C00540AB2811D7922ECB6C9338B4CB@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com> <4C696528.5030109@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C696528.5030109@amd.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Andre Przywara Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Andre Przywara wr= ote: > Dulloor wrote: >> >> Implement the following config options : >> >> strategy =3D =93str=94, where str is confine/stripe/split/auto > > While playing around with it, I am always confused with the similarity > between split und stripe. Can we replace stripe with interleave? This ter= m > seems to be used in hardware and other tools like numactl, so it would be > nice to not add another name for it. Makes sense. Will do that. > > Regards, > Andre. > > -- > Andre Przywara > AMD-Operating System Research Center (OSRC), Dresden, Germany > Tel: +49 351 448-3567-12 > >