From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ideas for PV on SeaBIOS
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 06:24:07 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=jNak8neUhDdZ+qUKVzz1qM_xC5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikE+98CEbfcW4-M_7ECkiyTmnAMjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110521132948.GA9679@morn.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <seabios-bounces@seabios.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110521132948.GA9679@morn.localdomain>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.seabios.org/mailman/options/seabios>,
	<mailto:seabios-request@seabios.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios>
List-Post: <mailto:seabios@seabios.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seabios-request@seabios.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios>,
	<mailto:seabios-request@seabios.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: seabios-bounces@seabios.org
Sender: seabios-bounces@seabios.org
To: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
Cc: Daniel Castro <evil.dani@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, seabios@seabios.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 02:33:52PM +0900, Daniel Castro wrote:
>> Good Day,
>>
>> In order to give PV Drivers to SeaBIOS we will need to solve a few
>> problems, one is the following:
>> Does a booting kernel informs the BIOS that it will leave real mode
>> and not use it again? When the booting kernel uses CPU real mode for
>> the last time, how can we (Xen or SeaBIOS) know that real mode will no
>> longer be used, and hence BIOS calls will not be issued?
>
> In the general case, no.
>
> The ACPI spec does define a mechanism for the OS to inform the BIOS
> that it is transitioning from "Legacy state" to "Working state" via an
> SMI. =A0SeaBIOS does have code for this (see src/smm.c), but it doesn't
> currently do anything interesting. =A0Unfortunately, this is only
> available for OSs that support ACPI.
>
>> We want upon last real mode usage to leave all Xen PV information in a
>> clean state, this means, closing the channel and ring between the
>> newly created domain and the host system.
>
> Is it required to close the channel? =A0Can opening a new channel
> implicitly close the old channel (I believe this is what the virtio
> stuff does)?

There ought to be a way for the guest to reset the device.  At least
in virtio this can be done and allows an in-use device to be reused,
no matter what state it is in.

Stefan