From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Swett Subject: Re: Trying to track down odd behavior, errors in xen dmesg Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:20:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20110407135459.GB7258@dumpdata.com> <20110407160139.GA9826@dumpdata.com> <20110407162307.GA30422@dumpdata.com> <20110408135337.GG6189@dumpdata.com> <20110412102002.GA30108@dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110412102002.GA30108@dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Konrad, That seems to have fixed it, i'm not seeing the error messages anymore and performance seems correct thus far. I'll continue to test a couple more scenarios today and let you know if I see anything odd. How should we go about getting this over to the debian maintainers? --Keith On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:59:58AM -0500, Keith Swett wrote: >> Not a problem, would be happy to beta test. =A0Send the patches my way >> whenever they're available. > > Did a backport, but I don't have yet the software iSCSI target > available so couldn't do proper tests. Please test and email kernel log > messages. > >> Would you like me to be building against the debian-src of the >> packages or would another tree be more beneficial? > > That tree should be OK. > > See attached patch. >