From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ZhouPeng Subject: Re: Fwd:[PATCH-may be a bug ignored] tools/libxl/libxl__build_device_model_args_new/old: The condition is so rigorous that user has no chance to disable the vnc Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:28:54 +0800 Message-ID: References: <19911.57349.743943.518422@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19911.57349.743943.518422@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org 2011/5/9 Ian Jackson : > ZhouPeng writes ("[Xen-devel] Fwd:[PATCH-may be a bug ignored] tools/libx= l/libxl__build_device_model_args_new/old: The condition is so rigorous that= user has no chance to disable the vnc"): >> In my spice testing, >> I find user have no way to disable vnc in qemu-old and new using xl, >> no matter how to set >> "vnc vncunused vncpasswd vncdisplay vnclisten" in vm cfg file. > > Does your patch not have the effect of turning vnc off by default ? =A0I > don't think that's correct. Reply again because I suspect I misunderstood you. Do you mean the vnc should be turned off by default or not? In my patch, I assume the vnc should be turned on by default. --=20 Zhou Peng Operating System Technology Group Institute of Software, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISCAS)