xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@gmail.com>
To: MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@hotmail.com>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	dave@ivt.com.au
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1872
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:25:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimKWanNYTjrEHaik_Z1eLXptoN1kQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU157-w116F1BB57ABFDE535C7851DAA80@phx.gbl>

2011/4/11 MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@hotmail.com>:
> Hi:
>
>      I believe this is the fix at much extent.
>      Since I have my own test cases which with this patch, my test case will
> success in 30 rounds run.
>      Every round takes 8hours.  While without this patch, tests fail evey
> round in 15minutes.
>
>       So this really means fix most of the things.
>
>       But during running, I met another crash, from the log it it looks like
> has relation with
> this BUG, since the crash log shows it is tlb related and this BUG also tlb
> related.

Are you able to run another test with cpuidle=0 cpufreq=none in kernel
boot option?  Just curious whether can you reproduce the tlb bug when
you boot with cpuidle=0 cpufreq=none... ...

>
>       Well, I'm also have poor knowledge of kernel.
>       Hope someone from Xen Devel offer some help.
>
>       Many thanks.
>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:16:53 +0800
>> Subject: Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1872
>> From: giamteckchoon@gmail.com
>> To: tinnycloud@hotmail.com
>> CC: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; dave@ivt.com.au;
>> ian.campbell@citrix.com; konrad.wilk@oracle.com; jeremy@goop.org;
>> keir@xen.org
>>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sorry, since this mmu related BUG has been troubled me for very
>> > long... I really want to "kill" this BUG but my knowledge in kernel
>> > hacking and/or xen is very limited.
>> >
>> > While waiting for Jeremy or Konrad or others ...
>> >
>> > Many thanks for spending time to track down this mmu related BUG.  I
>> > have backported the commit from
>> >
>> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=64141da587241301ce8638cc945f8b67853156ec
>> > to 2.6.32.36 PVOPS kernel and patch attached.  I won't know whether
>> > did I backport it correctly nor does it affects anything.  I am
>> > currently testing the 2.6.32.36 PVOPS kernel with this patch applied
>> > and also unset CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC.  Currently running testcrash.sh
>> > loop 1000 as I am unable to reproduce this mmu BUG 1872 in
>> > testcrash.sh loop 100.  Please note that when CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>> > is unset, I can reproduce this mmu BUG 1872 easily within <50
>> > testcrash.sh loop cycle with PVOPS version 2.6.32.24 to 2.6.32.36
>> > kernel.  Now test with this backport patch to see whether I can
>> > reproduce this mmu BUG... ...
>> >
>> > Kindest regards,
>> > Giam Teck Choon
>> >
>>
>> I have tested with my backport patch and it is working fine as I am
>> unable to reproduce the mmu.c 1872 or 1860 bug with
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC not set. I tested with testcrash.sh loop 100
>> and 1000. Now doing testcrash.sh loop 10000.
>>
>> Xiaoyun, is it possible for you to test my patch and see whether can
>> you reproduce the mmu.c 1872/1860 bug?
>>
>> Can anyone of you review my patch?
>>
>> I will post a format patch according to
>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches in my next reply and hopefully can be
>> reviewed.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>> Giam Teck Choon
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-11 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <COL0-MC1-F14hmBzxHs00230882@col0-mc1-f14.Col0.hotmail.com>
2011-04-08 11:24 ` kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-08 11:46   ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-10  3:57   ` kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1872 MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-10  4:29   ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-10 13:57     ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-10 20:14       ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-11 12:16         ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-11 12:22           ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-11 12:31           ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-11 15:25             ` Teck Choon Giam [this message]
2011-04-12  3:30               ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-12 16:08                 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-11 18:08             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-04-12  3:35               ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-12  6:48                 ` Grant Table Error on 2.6.32.36 + Xen 4.0.1 MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-12  8:46                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12  9:02                     ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-12  9:11                 ` Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61 MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-12 10:00                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-04-12 10:10                     ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-14  6:16                     ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-14  7:26                       ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-14  7:56                         ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-14 11:16                           ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-15 12:23                             ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-15 21:22                               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-04-18 15:20                                 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-25  3:15                                 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-26  5:52                                   ` Tian, Kevin
2011-04-26  7:04                                     ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-26  8:31                                       ` Tian, Kevin
2011-04-28 23:29                                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-04-29  0:19                                       ` Tian, Kevin
2011-04-29  1:50                                         ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-29  1:57                                           ` Tian, Kevin
2011-04-25  4:42                                 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-25 12:54                                   ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-25 13:11                                     ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-25 15:05                                       ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-04-26  5:55                                         ` Tian, Kevin
2011-04-12 16:32               ` kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1872 Teck Choon Giam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTimKWanNYTjrEHaik_Z1eLXptoN1kQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=giamteckchoon@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@ivt.com.au \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=tinnycloud@hotmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).