From: Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Dave Hunter <dave@ivt.com.au>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas.
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:16:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimx6Ki4+G9gi2smc=cTsX+PW+dQUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9CE0B3.9040204@goop.org>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 12:53 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> Please don't top post.
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 00:20 +0100, Dave Hunter wrote:
>>> Is it likely that Debian would release an updated kernel in squeeze with
>>> this configuration? (sorry, this might not be the place to ask).
>> I doubt they will, enabling DEBUG_PAGEALLOC seems very much like a
>> workaround not a solution to me.
>
> Yes, it will impose a pretty large performance overhead.
>
> J
I understand that option will impose a pretty large performance
overhead but it is currently a working trade-off/solution/workaround
;) It is better to have that trade-off than having an unstable host
server for those of us who need LVM snapshots related... IMO.
Hopefully you or Konrad can have a look into the related codes and if
need some testers... I always will try my best to test any new patches
if available to test its stability in this... ...
Thanks.
Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-26 8:16 kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-27 15:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-12-27 22:14 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-28 10:42 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-12-28 18:01 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-29 4:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2010-12-29 4:58 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 15:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 19:25 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 19:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 20:09 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 20:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-24 1:42 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-24 14:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-24 15:56 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-25 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-26 14:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 17:17 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-27 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-27 22:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-02-26 12:03 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-02-28 16:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-01 9:59 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-03 22:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-04 5:30 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-04 6:15 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-03-04 6:33 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-08 19:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-08 20:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-08 20:20 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-08 20:45 ` Guido Hecken
2011-03-08 20:50 ` [SPAM] " tjaouen
2011-03-09 0:06 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-11 18:38 ` benco
2011-03-11 19:59 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-03-11 20:29 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-11 20:45 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-11 21:02 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2011-03-11 21:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-09 0:43 ` [SPAM] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-09 6:58 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-09 15:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-09 19:59 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-10 7:20 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-10 13:45 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-11 18:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-14 10:25 ` Ian Campbell
2011-03-14 10:36 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-16 15:52 ` [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-16 16:26 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-16 16:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-24 11:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-03-24 21:28 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-25 3:57 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-27 10:16 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-03-28 11:37 ` Andreas Olsowski
2011-03-28 12:29 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-05 22:01 ` Dave Hunter
2011-04-05 22:15 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-04-05 23:20 ` Dave Hunter
2011-04-06 7:53 ` Ian Campbell
2011-04-06 21:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-04-07 13:16 ` Teck Choon Giam [this message]
2011-03-09 0:41 ` kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-04 15:10 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 15:19 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 15:37 ` benco
2011-01-04 18:40 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 19:32 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-04 19:56 ` benco
2011-01-14 15:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 15:33 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-04 23:10 ` Christophe Saout
2011-01-05 10:51 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-01-05 14:56 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-14 15:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-14 19:31 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-04 13:48 ` Ian Campbell
2011-01-04 19:24 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-05 15:30 ` Teck Choon Giam
2011-01-13 14:28 ` tjaouen
2011-01-14 14:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTimx6Ki4+G9gi2smc=cTsX+PW+dQUQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=giamteckchoon@gmail.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=dave@ivt.com.au \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).