From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lyon Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: scsi host passthru not working after upgrade to 4.1.0 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:35:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20110415101453.GB32595@reaktio.net> <201104201538.21281.tobias.geiger@vido.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201104201538.21281.tobias.geiger@vido.info> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Tobias Geiger Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users List , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Tobias Geiger wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >> > Kernel is 2.6.38 xenified using suse patches, not pv_ops. > > Could you share this xenifier-patch with us? > http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel only has sources up to 2.6.34 > and a suse-xenified kernel is still a must when we want to use nvidia-binary- > drivers.... > > Thanks in advance! > > Greetings > Tobias Hi Tobias, I've uploaded 2.6.38-r1 patches and ebuild to http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list , ebuild uses genpatches v4 for kernel 2.6.38.4, I've not actually tested this set myself as I am currently running 2.6.38 and several long running jobs make it inconvenient to reboot, however I do not expect any problems as the current 2.6.38 suse patches that I use do not require any changes at all to apply to vanilla. I've not had time to update for a while so I've gone straight from .34 to .38, but so far it seems very stable. Andy